# Astrophysical component separation

## CMB and foreground separation[edit]

The component-separation papers, Planck-2013-XII^{[1]}, Planck-2015-A09^{[2]} and Planck-2020-A4^{[3]} (and references therein), give details of these processing steps. Four separate component-separation methods are used, which we now describe in turn.

### Commander[edit]

The Commander approach implements Bayesian component separation, fitting a parametric model to the data by sampling the corresponding posterior distribution. The computational engine in this approach is standard Gibbs sampling. The general Commander model includes both cosmological parameters (i.e., the CMB map and power spectrum), astrophysical parameters (e.g., synchrotron, free-free, spinning and thermal dust, and CO emission), and instrumental parameters (e.g., calibration factors, absolute zero-levels, and bandpass corrections). The full model was employed in the Planck 2015 analysis (Planck-2015-A10^{[4]}) which included both single-detector Planck maps and external observations from WMAP and Haslam. For the reduction of the Planck 2018 data set, which includes only full-frequency maps, a simpler model is employed, in which only a single joint power-law low-frequency foreground model is included in the fit, accouting simultaneously for synchrotron, free-free and spinning dust emission, and no bandpass corrections are applied. (Note that 'bandpass corrections' in this setting implies fitting for the actual bandpass profile of each detector, and not standard colour correction and unit conversion, which always is performed in all cases.) For polarization analysis, the signal model includes only CMB, synchrotron and thermal dust emission.

A major difference between the Planck 2015 and 2018 Commander analyses is the introduction of Commander2 in 2018. As discussed by Eriksen et al. 2018 and Planck-2015-A10^{[4]}, the first version of the Commander code required all frequency maps to have identical angular resolution. In practice, this required smoothing of all maps to 1 degree FWHM if external data sets (WMAP and Haslam 408 MHz) were considered, or 40 arcmin FWHM for Planck alone. Higher resolution could only be achieved by omitting lower frequencies from the fit. Either approach translates into non-optimal use of the available information content. This restriction is removed by the Commander2 implementation (see Seljebotn et al. 2018), which accounts explicitly for the specific instrumental beam of each frequency channel. Furthermore, by processing the data at full angular resolution Commander2 additionally supports fitting of individual point sources, given some beam template for each object. The 2018 Commander processing employs FEBeCoP templates centered on the closest pixel for this purpose.

### NILC[edit]

NILC is a linear method for combining the input frequency channels. It implements an "internal linear combination" method with weighting coefficients varying over the sky and over the multipole range up to ℓ=3200, and it does so using "needlets," which are spherical wavelets. A special procedure is used for processing the coarsest needlet scale, which contains the large-scale multipoles.

In practice, our NILC processing depends on several implementation choices, as follows.

- Input channels
- In this implementation, the NILC algorithm is applied to all Planck channels from 44 to 857 GHz, omitting only the 30-GHz channel.
- Pre-processing of point sources
- Identical to the SMICA pre-processing.
- Masking and inpainting
- The NILC CMB map is actually produced in a three-step process. In a first step, the NILC weights are computed from covariance matrices evaluated using a Galactic mask removing about 2 % of the sky (and apodized at °). In a second step, those NILC weights are applied to needlet coefficients computed over the complete sky (except for point source masking/subtraction), yielding a NILC CMB estimate over the full sky (except for the point source mask). In other words, the weights are computed over a masked sky, but are applied to a full sky (excluding point sources). In a final step, the pixels masked due to point source processing are replaced by the values of a constrained Gaussian realization ("inpainting").
- Spatial localization
- The boundaries of the zones used for spatial localization are obtained as iso-level curves of a low resolution map of Galactic emission.
- Beam control and transfer function
- As in the SMICA processing, the input maps are internally re-smoothed to a 5 arcmin resolution, so the resulting CMB map is automatically synthesized with an effective Gaussian beam of 5 arcmin, according to the unbiased nature of the ILC.
- Using SMICA recalibration
- In our current implementation, the NILC solution uses the values determined by SMICA for the CMB spectrum.

### SEVEM[edit]

The aim of Sevem is to produce clean CMB maps at one or several frequencies by using a procedure based on template fitting. The templates are internal, i.e., they are constructed from Planck data, avoiding the need for external data sets, which usually complicates the analyses and may introduce inconsistencies. The method has been successfully applied to Planck simulations (Leach et al., 2008^{[5]}) and to WMAP polarization data (Fernandez-Cobos et al., 2012^{[6]}). In the cleaning process, no assumptions about the foregrounds or noise levels are needed, rendering the technique very robust.

The input maps used are all the Planck frequency channels. In particular, for intensity, we have cleaned the 100-, 143-, and 217-GHz maps using four templates. Three or them are constructed as the difference of the following Planck channels (smoothed to a common resolution to remove the CMB contribution): [30GHz – 44GHz]; [44GHz – 70GHz]; and [545GHz – 353GHz]. A fourth template is given by the 857-GHz channel (smoothed at the resolution of the 545-GHz channel). For polarization we clean maps at frequencies of 70-, 100- and 143-GHz using three templates for each channel. In particular, we use [30GHz – 44GHz] smoothed to a common resolution, [353GHz – 217GHz] at 10 arcmin, and [217GHz – 143GHz] at 1° resolution to clean the 70- and 100-GHz maps. To clean the 143-GHz channel, the last template is replaced by [217GHz – 100GHz] at 1° resolution. Before constructing the templates, for both intensity and polarization, we perform inpainting at the positions of detected point sources to reduce contamination in the final map.

A linear combination of the templates is then subtracted from the Planck sky map at the considered frequency, in order to produce the clean CMB map. The coefficients of the linear combination are obtained by minimizing the variance of the clean map outside a given mask. Although we exclude very contaminated regions during the minimization, the subtraction is performed for all pixels and therefore the cleaned maps cover the full-sky (although we expect that foreground residuals are present in the excluded areas). Inpainting of point sources is also carried out in the clean maps.

The final CMB intensity map has then been constructed by combining the 143- and 217-GHz cleaned maps by weighting them in harmonic space taking into account the noise level, the resolution and a rough estimation of the foreground residuals of each map (obtained from realistic simulations). This final map has a resolution corresponding to a Gaussian beam of FWHM=5 arcmin at *N*_{side}=2048. The final CMB polarization map has been obtained by combining the 100- and 143-GHz clean maps at *N*_{side}=1024 and has a resolution of 10 arcmin.

### SMICA[edit]

SMICA reconstructs a CMB map as a linear combination
in the harmonic domain of *N*_{chan} input frequency maps
with weights that depend on multipole ℓ. Given the
*N*_{chan}× 1 vector **x**_{ℓm} of
spherical harmonic coefficients for the input maps, it computes
coefficients *s*_{ℓm} for the CMB map as

where the *N*_{chan}× 1 vector **w**_{ℓ
}, which contains the multipole-dependent weights, is built to
give unit gain to the CMB with minimum variance. This is achieved
with

where vector **a** is the emission spectrum of the
CMB evaluated at each channel (allowing for possible inter-channel
recalibration factors) and **R**_{ℓ} is the
*N*_{chan} × *N*_{chan} spectral covariance matrix of
**x**_{ℓm}. Taking **R**_{ℓ}
in the second equation
to be the sample spectral covariance matrix
**Ř**_{ℓ} of the observations:

would implement a simple harmonic-domain ILC. However, this is not what SMICA
does. As discussed below, we instead use a model **R**_{ℓ} (θ)
and determine the covariance matrix to be used in the second equation
by fitting **R**_{ℓ}(θ) to
**Ř**_{ℓ}. This is done in the maximum
likelihood sense for stationary Gaussian fields, yielding the best fit
model parameters θ as

SMICA models the data as a superposition of CMB, noise, and
foregrounds. The latter are not parametrically modelled; instead, we
represent the total foreground emission by *d* templates
with arbitrary frequency spectra, angular spectra and correlations, i.e.,

where *C*_{ℓ} is the angular power spectrum of the CMB,
**A** is a *N*_{chan} × d matrix,
**P**_{ℓ} is a positive *d* × *d* matrix,
and **N**_{ℓ} is a diagonal matrix representing
the noise power spectrum. The parameter vector **θ** contains
all or part of the quantities in the above equation.

The above equations summarize the basic principles of SMICA; its actual operation depends on a choice for the spectral model

and on several execution-specific details.

The actual implementation of SMICA includes the following steps:

- Inputs
- All nine Planck frequency channels from 30 to 857 GHz, harmonically transformed up to ℓ = 4000.
- Fit
- In practice, the SMICA fit (i.e., the minimization of the fourth equation above), is conducted in three successive steps. We first estimate the CMB spectrum by fitting all model parameters over a clean fraction of sky in the range 100 ≤ ℓ ≤ 680 and retaining the best fit value for vector
**a**. In the second step, we estimate the foreground emissivity by fixing**a**to its value from the previous step and fitting all the other parameters over a large fraction of sky in the range 4 ≤ ℓ ≤ 150 and retaining the best fit values for the matrix**A**. In the last step, we fit all power spectrum parameters; that is, we fix**a**and**A**to their previously found values and fit for*C*_{ℓ}and**P**_{ℓ}at each ℓ. - Beams
- The discussion thus far has assumed that all input maps have the same resolution and effective beam. Since the observed maps actually vary in resolution, we process the input maps in the following way. To the
*i*th input map with effective beam*b*_{i}(ℓ) and sampled on a HEALPix grid with*N*^{i}_{side}, the CMB sky multipole*s*_{ℓm}actually contributes*s*_{ℓm}*a*_{i}*b*_{i}(ℓ)*p*_{i}(ℓ), where*p*_{i}(ℓ) is the pixel window function for the grid at*N*^{i}_{side}. Seeking a final CMB map at 5-arcmin resolution, the highest resolution of Planck, we work with input spherical harmonics re-smoothed to 5 arcmins,**~x**_{ℓ}; that is, SMICA operates on vectors with entries**~x**^{i}_{ℓm}=*x*^{i}_{ℓm}*b*_{5}(ℓ) /*b*_{i}(ℓ) /*p*_{i}(ℓ), where*b*_{5}(ℓ) is a 5 arcmin Gaussian beam function. By construction, SMICA then produces a CMB map with an effective Gaussian beam of 5 arcmin (without the pixel window function). - Pre-processing
- We start by fitting point sources with S/N > 5 in the PCCS catalogue in each input map. If the fit is successful, the fitted point source is removed from the map; otherwise it is masked and the hole inpainted. This is done at all frequencies except 545 and 857 GHz, where all point sources with S/N > 7.5 are masked and inpainted.
- Masking and inpainting
- In practice, SMICA uses a small Galactic mask, leaving 97% of the sky. However, we deliver a full-sky CMB map in which the masked pixels (Galactic emission and point sources) are replaced by a constrained Gaussian realization.
- Binning
- In our implementation, we use binned spectra.
- High ℓ
- Since there is little point trying to model the spectral covariance at high multipoles (because the sample estimate is sufficient), SMICA implements a simple harmonic ILC at ℓ > 1500; i.e., it applies the filter (second equation above) with
**R**_{ℓ}= Ř_{ℓ}.

Viewed as a filter, SMICA can be summarized by the weights **w**_{ℓ} applied to each input map as a function of multipole. In this sense, SMICA is strictly equivalent to co-adding the input maps after convolution by specific axisymmetric kernels directly related to the corresponding entry of **w**_{ℓ}. The SMICA weights used here are shown below for input maps in units of K . They show, in particular, the (expected) progressive attenuation of the lowest resolution channels with increasing multipole.

## References[edit]

- ↑
**Planck 2013 results. XI. Component separation**, Planck Collaboration, 2014, A&A, 571, A11. - ↑
**Planck 2015 results. XI. Diffuse component separation: CMB maps**, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A9. - ↑
**Planck 2018 results. IV. Diffuse component separation**, Planck Collaboration, 2020, A&A, 641, A4. - ↑
^{4.0}^{4.1}**Planck 2015 results. X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps**, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A10. - ↑
**Component separation methods for the PLANCK mission**, S. M. Leach, J.-F. Cardoso, C. Baccigalupi, R. B. Barreiro, M. Betoule, J. Bobin, A. Bonaldi, J. Delabrouille, G. de Zotti, C. Dickinson, H. K. Eriksen, J. González-Nuevo, F. K. Hansen, D. Herranz, M. Le Jeune, M. López-Caniego, E. Martínez-González, M. Massardi, J.-B. Melin, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, G. Patanchon, S. Prunet, S. Ricciardi, E. Salerno, J. L. Sanz, J.-L. Starck, F. Stivoli, V. Stolyarov, R. Stompor, P. Vielva, A&A,**491**, 597-615, (2008). - ↑
**Multiresolution internal template cleaning: an application to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe 7-yr polarization data**, R. Fernández-Cobos, P. Vielva, R. B. Barreiro, E. Martínez-González, MNRAS,**420**, 2162-2169, (2012).

Cosmic Microwave background

Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum

(Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelation of a sphere, <ref name="Template:Gorski2005">**HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere**, K. M. Górski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, M. Bartelmann, ApJ, **622**, 759-771, (2005).