Difference between revisions of "BibTestLM"

From Planck Legacy Archive Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
   
 
   
This is a test link <cite>{{PCite|#planck2012-I}}</cite>.
+
This is a test link <cite>{{PCite|#planck2012-I}}</cite>.<cite>#planck2012-I</cite>
  
 
{{PPreLaunch|10||link=and we get a link here <cite>#dupac2005,#hanson2009</cite>}} but it looks a bit odd.
 
{{PPreLaunch|10||link=and we get a link here <cite>#dupac2005,#hanson2009</cite>}} but it looks a bit odd.

Revision as of 18:43, 7 February 2013

This is a test link

  1. planck2012-I.#planck2012-I

and we get a link here #dupac2005,#hanson2009 but it looks a bit odd.

Laurent own test:

  • This example here #dupac2005,#hanson2009 doesn't gives the titles of the papers in the text itself. And this forces to have at the bottom of each wiki page all papers referecned in the page.


LM replies: Please disregard the example above... I wrote it while I was playing with different possibilities. Instead look at this. I can cite a paper like this #planck2011-1-1. To add references to a page you include the lines at the end of said page (the biblio stuff). Now by clicking on the number inside square brackets you will be taken to the reference at the end of the page. In this case nothing happens because the page is to small for scrolling to be necessary. If you now clik on the name of the paper you will be taken to the corresponding url.

Note that there is no need to enter the details of each bib record everytime you need to cite one. All the records are stored int he References page.

AC: we are using a MediaWiki engine. I saw with Laurent that on current WikiPedia pages that we can have a window containing informations (suggestion: bib entry) and link (e.g. to the PDF)

Ken's two Euro-cents: I would like to have some indication of to what we are referring to in the text itself -- often I'll recognize it, and can ignore it. It should be short, but not too short, if you know what I mean. A simple number is a bit too short -- I can't recognize it. I really dislike having to go somewhere else and then decide what to do. It's a distraction. I want to be able to decide right while I'm reading the text if I should click and go somewhere else, or stay where I am. So, I think this means that I like Laurent's Own Test above, but instead of just seeing a number, I should see something like ([Vibert et al. 1990]). Then, if I click the reference, or if necessary, the little icon next to it, I will be taken to the astro-ph/ApJ/A&A abstract page...

<biblio force=false>

  1. References

</biblio>