Difference between revisions of "HFI-Validation"
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The overall internal validation of the frequency maps is seen thanks to several tests: | The overall internal validation of the frequency maps is seen thanks to several tests: | ||
− | * difference between the PR2 and PR3 frequency maps, | + | * difference between the PR2 (2015) and PR3 (2018) frequency maps, |
* survey difference maps for the PR2 and the PR3 frequency maps, | * survey difference maps for the PR2 and the PR3 frequency maps, | ||
* spectra of the PR2 and the PR3 data splits, | * spectra of the PR2 and the PR3 data splits, | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<span style="font-size:150%">'''Frequency maps for the PR2 and the PR3 and their difference''' </span> | <span style="font-size:150%">'''Frequency maps for the PR2 and the PR3 and their difference''' </span> | ||
− | This table shows the PR2 | + | This table shows the PR2 and PR3 maps and their differences in I, Q, and U. This table is complementary of Figure 11 of {{PlanckPapers|planck2016-l03}} (see detailled explanations there). |
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="text-align:centert" width=800px | {| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" align="center" style="text-align:centert" width=800px | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|- bgcolor="ffdead" | |- bgcolor="ffdead" | ||
! | ! | ||
− | !colspan="3"| | + | !colspan="3"| PR2 frequency maps |
− | !colspan="3"| | + | !colspan="3"| PR3 frequency maps |
!colspan="3"| difference | !colspan="3"| difference | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 09:25, 28 May 2018
The overall internal validation of the frequency maps is seen thanks to several tests:
- difference between the PR2 (2015) and PR3 (2018) frequency maps,
- survey difference maps for the PR2 and the PR3 frequency maps,
- spectra of the PR2 and the PR3 data splits,
- comparison of the simulated noise and systematic residuals and the PR3 data.
Frequency maps for the PR2 and the PR3 and their difference
This table shows the PR2 and PR3 maps and their differences in I, Q, and U. This table is complementary of Figure 11 of Planck-2020-A3[1] (see detailled explanations there).
Survey difference maps for the PR2 and the PR3 data
This table shows the PR2 (2015) and PR3 (2017) survey difference maps in I, Q, and U. This table is taken from Figure 12 of Planck-2020-A3[1] (see detailled explanations there).
2015 survey difference maps | 2017 survey difference maps | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | Q | U | I | Q | U | |
100 GHz | ||||||
143 GHz | ||||||
217 GHz | ||||||
353 GHz | ||||||
545 GHz | . | . | . | . | ||
857 GHz | . | . | . | . |
Spectra of the PR2 and the PR3 data splits
This figure shows the EE and BB spectra of the 2015 and 2017 detset, half-mission and rings (for 2017 only) maps at 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz. The auto-spectra of the difference maps and the cross-spectra between the maps are shown. The sky fraction used here is 43 %. The bins are: bin=1 for Planck-2020-A3[1] (see detailled explanations there).
; bin=5 for ; bin=10 for ; bin=20 for ; and bin=100 for . This figure is taken from
Comparison of the simulated noise and systematic residuals and the PR3 data
This figure shows the noise and systematic residuals in TT, EE, BB, and EB spectra, at the three CMB frequencies, for difference maps of the ring (red) and half-mission (blue) null tests binned by . Data spectra are represented by thick lines, and the averages of simulations by thin black lines. For the simulations, we show the 16 % and 84 % quantiles of the distribution with the same colours. This figure is taken from Planck-2020-A3[1] (see detailled explanations there).
References[edit]
- ↑ 1.01.11.21.3 Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and frequency maps, Planck Collaboration, 2020, A&A, 641, A3.
Cosmic Microwave background