Difference between revisions of "Summary LFI"
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}} | ||
− | + | Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper {{PlanckPapers|planck2016-l02}}. | |
+ | {| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" align="center" | ||
+ | |+ '''Table 1. LFI performance parameters''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | !scope="col"| Parameter | ||
+ | !scope="col"| 30 GHz | ||
+ | !scope="col"| 44 GHz | ||
+ | !scope="col"| 70 GHz | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Centre frequency [GHz] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 28.4 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 44.1 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 70.4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Bandwidth [GHz] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 9.89 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 10.72 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 14.90 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Scanning beam FWHM<sup>a</sup> [arcmin] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 33.10 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 27.94 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 13.08 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Scanning beam ellipticity<sup>a</sup> | ||
+ | |width="100" | 1.37 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 1.25 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 1.27 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Effective beam FWHM<sup>b</sup> [arcmin] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 32.29 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 27.00 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 13.22 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | White noise level in timelines<sup>c</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub> s<sup>1/2</sup>] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 147.9 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 174.0 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 151.9 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | <i>f</i><sub>knee</sub><sup>c</sup> [mHz] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 113.9 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 53.0 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 19.6 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | 1/<i>f</i> slope<sup>c</sup> | ||
+ | |width="100" | -0.92 | ||
+ | |width="100" | -0.88 | ||
+ | |width="100" | -1.20 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |width="320" | Overall calibration uncertainty<sup>d</sup> [%] | ||
+ | |width="100" | 0.17 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 0.12 | ||
+ | |width="100" | 0.20 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <sup>a</sup> Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <sup>b</sup> Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, Ω<sub>eff</sub> = mean(Ω). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline ({{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a35}}). | ||
+ | <!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <sup>c</sup> Typical values derived from fitting noise spectra | ||
+ | |||
+ | <sup>d</sup> difference between first and last iteration of the iterative calibration (for 30 and 44 GHz) or E2E 2015 result (for 70 GHz). In 2015 the calibration uncertainity was 0.35% and 0.26% at 30 and 44, respectively. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
Line 17: | Line 73: | ||
'''Table 1. Summary of the LFI performance parameters''' | '''Table 1. Summary of the LFI performance parameters''' | ||
[[File:Lfi_perf.jpg|thumb|center|655px|<math>^{ \rm a \, }</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. Those values are within the 1% with the withe noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking in account the actual mission time minus the manoeuvres and bad-science flagged data | [[File:Lfi_perf.jpg|thumb|center|655px|<math>^{ \rm a \, }</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. Those values are within the 1% with the withe noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking in account the actual mission time minus the manoeuvres and bad-science flagged data | ||
− | <math>^{ \rm b \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from scanning beam evaluated fitting Jupiter directly in the timelines. <math>\hspace{ | + | <math>^{ \rm b \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from scanning beam evaluated fitting Jupiter directly in the timelines. <math>\hspace{49mm} </math> |
<math>^{ \rm c \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from effective beam evaluated as mean from different position on the sky. <math>\hspace{42mm} </math> | <math>^{ \rm c \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from effective beam evaluated as mean from different position on the sky. <math>\hspace{42mm} </math> | ||
<math>^{ \rm d \, }</math> FWHM from effective beam evaluated as FWHM<math>_{eff} = \sqrt{\frac{Ω}{2π}} · 2 · \sqrt{2 \log 2}</math>, where Ω is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam. Those are the values used in the source extraction pipeline <cite>#planck2013-p05</cite> {{P2013|28}} | <math>^{ \rm d \, }</math> FWHM from effective beam evaluated as FWHM<math>_{eff} = \sqrt{\frac{Ω}{2π}} · 2 · \sqrt{2 \log 2}</math>, where Ω is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam. Those are the values used in the source extraction pipeline <cite>#planck2013-p05</cite> {{P2013|28}} | ||
Line 25: | Line 81: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
− | + | <references /> | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | </ | ||
[[Category:LFI data processing|008]] | [[Category:LFI data processing|008]] |
Latest revision as of 16:00, 5 July 2018
Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper Planck-2020-A2[1].
Parameter | 30 GHz | 44 GHz | 70 GHz |
---|---|---|---|
Centre frequency [GHz] | 28.4 | 44.1 | 70.4 |
Bandwidth [GHz] | 9.89 | 10.72 | 14.90 |
Scanning beam FWHMa [arcmin] | 33.10 | 27.94 | 13.08 |
Scanning beam ellipticitya | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.27 |
Effective beam FWHMb [arcmin] | 32.29 | 27.00 | 13.22 |
White noise level in timelinesc [μKCMB s1/2] | 147.9 | 174.0 | 151.9 |
fkneec [mHz] | 113.9 | 53.0 | 19.6 |
1/f slopec | -0.92 | -0.88 | -1.20 |
Overall calibration uncertaintyd [%] | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
a Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines.
b Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, Ωeff = mean(Ω). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline (Planck-2015-A26[2]).
c Typical values derived from fitting noise spectra
d difference between first and last iteration of the iterative calibration (for 30 and 44 GHz) or E2E 2015 result (for 70 GHz). In 2015 the calibration uncertainity was 0.35% and 0.26% at 30 and 44, respectively.
References[edit]
- ↑ Planck 2018 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing, Planck Collaboration, 2020, A&A, 641, A2.
- ↑ Planck 2015 results. XXVI. The second Planck catalogue of compact sources, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A26.
(Planck) Low Frequency Instrument
Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum
Cosmic Microwave background