Difference between revisions of "Summary LFI"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}} | ||
− | + | Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a03||Planck-2015-A03}}. | |
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02}} --> | <!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02}} --> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
!scope="col"| 70 GHz | !scope="col"| 70 GHz | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | | + | |width="320" | Centre frequency [GHz] |
|width="100" | 28.4 | |width="100" | 28.4 | ||
|width="100" | 44.1 | |width="100" | 44.1 | ||
|width="100" | 70.4 | |width="100" | 70.4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Scanning beam FWHM< | + | |width="320" | Scanning beam FWHM<sup>a</sup> [arcmin] |
|width="100" | 33.10 | |width="100" | 33.10 | ||
|width="100" | 27.94 | |width="100" | 27.94 | ||
|width="100" | 13.08 | |width="100" | 13.08 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Scanning beam ellipticity< | + | |width="320" | Scanning beam ellipticity<sup>a</sup> |
|width="100" | 1.37 | |width="100" | 1.37 | ||
|width="100" | 1.25 | |width="100" | 1.25 | ||
|width="100" | 1.27 | |width="100" | 1.27 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Effective beam FWHM< | + | |width="320" | Effective beam FWHM<sup>b</sup> [arcmin] |
|width="100" | 32.29 | |width="100" | 32.29 | ||
|width="100" | 27.00 | |width="100" | 27.00 | ||
|width="100" | 13.21 | |width="100" | 13.21 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | White noise level in map< | + | |width="320" | White noise level in map<sup>c</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub>] |
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | White noise level in timelines< | + | |width="320" | White noise level in timelines<sup>d</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub> s<sup>1/2</sup>] |
|width="100" | 148.1 | |width="100" | 148.1 | ||
|width="100" | 174.2 | |width="100" | 174.2 | ||
|width="100" | 152.0 | |width="100" | 152.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | f< | + | |width="320" | <i>f</i><sub>knee</sub><sup>d</sup> [mHz] |
|width="100" | 114.1 | |width="100" | 114.1 | ||
|width="100" | 52.4 | |width="100" | 52.4 | ||
|width="100" | 19.7 | |width="100" | 19.7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | 1/< | + | |width="320" | 1/<i>f</i> slope<sup>d</sup> |
|width="100" | -0.92 | |width="100" | -0.92 | ||
|width="100" | -0.88 | |width="100" | -0.88 | ||
|width="100" | -1.20 | |width="100" | -1.20 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Overall calibration uncertainty< | + | |width="320" | Overall calibration uncertainty<sup>e</sup> [%] |
|width="100" | 0.35 | |width="100" | 0.35 | ||
|width="100" | 0.26 | |width="100" | 0.26 | ||
|width="100" | 0.29 | |width="100" | 0.29 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes < | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>I</i> <sup>f</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub>] |
|width="100" | 0.88 | |width="100" | 0.88 | ||
|width="100" | 1.97 | |width="100" | 1.97 | ||
|width="100" | 1.87 | |width="100" | 1.87 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes < | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>Q</i> <sup>f</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub>] |
|width="100" | 1.11 | |width="100" | 1.11 | ||
|width="100" | 1.14 | |width="100" | 1.14 | ||
|width="100" | 2.25 | |width="100" | 2.25 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes < | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>U</i> <sup>f</sup> [μK<sub>CMB</sub>] |
|width="100" | 0.95 | |width="100" | 0.95 | ||
|width="100" | 1.29 | |width="100" | 1.29 | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | < | + | <sup>a</sup> Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines. |
− | < | + | <sup>b</sup> Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, Ω<sub>eff</sub> = mean(Ω). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline ({{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a35||Planck-2015-A35}}). |
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} --> | <!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} --> | ||
+ | <sup>c</sup> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps. | ||
− | < | + | <sup>d</sup> Values derived from fitting noise spectra. |
− | < | + | <sup>e</sup> Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at 50 < ℓ < 250, see {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a05||Planck-2015-A05}}. |
− | |||
− | |||
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02b}} --> | <!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02b}} --> | ||
− | < | + | <sup>f</sup> Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value distributions from simulated maps, see {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a03||Planck-2015-A03}}. |
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02a}} --> | <!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02a}} --> | ||
Revision as of 13:40, 19 September 2016
Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper Planck-2015-A03[1].
Parameter | 30 GHz | 44 GHz | 70 GHz |
---|---|---|---|
Centre frequency [GHz] | 28.4 | 44.1 | 70.4 |
Scanning beam FWHMa [arcmin] | 33.10 | 27.94 | 13.08 |
Scanning beam ellipticitya | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.27 |
Effective beam FWHMb [arcmin] | 32.29 | 27.00 | 13.21 |
White noise level in mapc [μKCMB] | *TBD | *TBD | *TBD |
White noise level in timelinesd [μKCMB s1/2] | 148.1 | 174.2 | 152.0 |
fkneed [mHz] | 114.1 | 52.4 | 19.7 |
1/f sloped | -0.92 | -0.88 | -1.20 |
Overall calibration uncertaintye [%] | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes I f [μKCMB] | 0.88 | 1.97 | 1.87 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes Q f [μKCMB] | 1.11 | 1.14 | 2.25 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes U f [μKCMB] | 0.95 | 1.29 | 2.22 |
a Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines.
b Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, Ωeff = mean(Ω). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline (Planck-2015-A35[2]).
c White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps.
d Values derived from fitting noise spectra.
e Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at 50 < ℓ < 250, see Planck-2015-A05[3].
f Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value distributions from simulated maps, see Planck-2015-A03[1].
References[edit]
- ↑ 1.01.1 Planck 2015 results. II. LFI processing, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A2.
- ↑ Planck 2015 results. XXVI. The second Planck catalogue of compact sources, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A26.
- ↑ Planck 2015 results. IV. LFI beams and window functions, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A4.
(Planck) Low Frequency Instrument
Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum
Cosmic Microwave background
To be defined / determined