Difference between revisions of "Summary LFI"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
!scope="col"| 70 GHz | !scope="col"| 70 GHz | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Center frequency [GHz] |
|width="100" | 28.4 | |width="100" | 28.4 | ||
|width="100" | 44.1 | |width="100" | 44.1 | ||
|width="100" | 70.4 | |width="100" | 70.4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Scanning beam FWHM<math>^{\rm a}</math> [arcmin] |
|width="100" | 33.10 | |width="100" | 33.10 | ||
|width="100" | 27.94 | |width="100" | 27.94 | ||
|width="100" | 13.08 | |width="100" | 13.08 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Scanning beam ellipticity<math>^{\rm a}</math> |
|width="100" | 1.37 | |width="100" | 1.37 | ||
|width="100" | 1.25 | |width="100" | 1.25 | ||
|width="100" | 1.27 | |width="100" | 1.27 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Effective beam FWHM<math>^{\rm b}</math> [arcmin] |
|width="100" | 32.29 | |width="100" | 32.29 | ||
|width="100" | 27.00 | |width="100" | 27.00 | ||
|width="100" | 13.21 | |width="100" | 13.21 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | White noise level in map<math>^{\rm c}</math> [<math>\mu</math>K<math>_{CMB}</math>] |
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|width="100" | *TBD | |width="100" | *TBD | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | White noise level in timelines<math>^{\rm d}</math> [<math>\mu</math>K<math>_{CMB} \;s^{1/2}</math>] |
|width="100" | 148.1 | |width="100" | 148.1 | ||
|width="100" | 174.2 | |width="100" | 174.2 | ||
|width="100" | 152.0 | |width="100" | 152.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | f<math>_{\rm knee}^{\rm d}</math> [mHz] |
|width="100" | 114.1 | |width="100" | 114.1 | ||
|width="100" | 52.4 | |width="100" | 52.4 | ||
|width="100" | 19.7 | |width="100" | 19.7 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | 1/<math>f</math> slope<math>^{\rm d}</math> |
|width="100" | -0.92 | |width="100" | -0.92 | ||
|width="100" | -0.88 | |width="100" | -0.88 | ||
|width="100" | -1.20 | |width="100" | -1.20 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Overall calibration uncertainty<math>^{\rm e}</math> [%] |
|width="100" | 0.35 | |width="100" | 0.35 | ||
|width="100" | 0.26 | |width="100" | 0.26 | ||
|width="100" | 0.29 | |width="100" | 0.29 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <math>I^{\rm f}</math> [<math>\mu</math>K<math>_{CMB}</math>] |
|width="100" | 0.88 | |width="100" | 0.88 | ||
|width="100" | 1.97 | |width="100" | 1.97 | ||
|width="100" | 1.87 | |width="100" | 1.87 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <math>Q^{\rm f}</math> [<math>\mu</math>K<math>_{CMB}</math>] |
|width="100" | 1.11 | |width="100" | 1.11 | ||
|width="100" | 1.14 | |width="100" | 1.14 | ||
|width="100" | 2.25 | |width="100" | 2.25 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |width=" | + | |width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <math>U^{\rm f}</math> [<math>\mu</math>K<math>_{CMB}</math>] |
|width="100" | 0.95 | |width="100" | 0.95 | ||
|width="100" | 1.29 | |width="100" | 1.29 | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<math>^{\rm a}</math> Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines. | <math>^{\rm a}</math> Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines. | ||
− | <math>^{\rm b}</math> Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, <math>\Omega_{\rm eff} = \hbox{mean}(\Omega)</math>. These values are used in the source extraction pipeline {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} . | + | <math>^{\rm b}</math> Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, <math>\Omega_{\rm eff} = \hbox{mean}(\Omega)</math>. These values are used in the source extraction pipeline {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a35||Planck-2015-A35}}. |
<math>^{\rm c}</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps. | <math>^{\rm c}</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps. | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
<math>^{\rm d}</math> Values derived from fitting noise spectra. | <math>^{\rm d}</math> Values derived from fitting noise spectra. | ||
− | <math>^{\rm e}</math> Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at <math>50 < \ell < 250 </math> (see {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02b}}. | + | <math>^{\rm e}</math> Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at <math>50 < \ell < 250 </math> (see {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02b}} {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a05||Planck-2015-A05}}. |
<math>^{\rm f}</math> Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value | <math>^{\rm f}</math> Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value | ||
− | distributions from simulated maps (see {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02a}}. | + | distributions from simulated maps (see {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02a}} {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a03||Planck-2015-A03}}. |
Revision as of 16:22, 3 February 2015
The LFI performance are summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper Planck-2013-II[1]Planck-2015-A03[2].
Parameter | 30 GHz | 44 GHz | 70 GHz |
---|---|---|---|
Center frequency [GHz] | 28.4 | 44.1 | 70.4 |
Scanning beam FWHM [arcmin] | 33.10 | 27.94 | 13.08 |
Scanning beam ellipticity | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.27 |
Effective beam FWHM [arcmin] | 32.29 | 27.00 | 13.21 |
White noise level in map | [ K ]*TBD | *TBD | *TBD |
White noise level in timelines | [ K ]148.1 | 174.2 | 152.0 |
f | [mHz]114.1 | 52.4 | 19.7 |
1/ | slope-0.92 | -0.88 | -1.20 |
Overall calibration uncertainty | [%]0.35 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes | [ K ]0.88 | 1.97 | 1.87 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes | [ K ]1.11 | 1.14 | 2.25 |
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes | [ K ]0.95 | 1.29 | 2.22 |
Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines.
Planck-2013-XXVIII[3]Planck-2015-A35[4].
Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, . These values are used in the source extraction pipelineWhite noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps.
Values derived from fitting noise spectra.
Planck-2013-V[5]Planck-2015-A05[6].
Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at (seePlanck-2013-III[7]Planck-2015-A03[2].
Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value distributions from simulated maps (seeReferences[edit]
- ↑ Planck 2013 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing, Planck Collaboration, 2014, A&A, 571, A2.
- ↑ 2.02.1 Planck 2015 results. II. LFI processing, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A2.
- ↑ Planck 2013 results. XXVIII. The Planck Catalogue of Compact Sources, Planck Collaboration, 2014, A&A, 571, A28.
- ↑ Planck 2015 results. XXVI. The second Planck catalogue of compact sources, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A26.
- ↑ Planck 2013 results. V. LFI Calibration, Planck Collaboration, 2014, A&A, 571, A5.
- ↑ Planck 2015 results. IV. LFI beams and window functions, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A4.
- ↑ Planck 2013 results. III. Low Frequency Instrument systematic uncertainties, Planck Collaboration, 2014, A&A, 571, A3.
(Planck) Low Frequency Instrument
Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum
Cosmic Microwave background
To be defined / determined