https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Talk:Survey_scanning_and_performance&feed=atom&action=historyTalk:Survey scanning and performance - Revision history2024-03-29T09:54:27ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.31.6https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Talk:Survey_scanning_and_performance&diff=8009&oldid=prevRleonard: Created page with 'SECTION: Survey scanning and performance. Reviewed by Leonardi Oct 2013. REVIEW: This section has been made public, and I think it is an important one. RECOMMENDATIONS: “The…'2013-10-03T09:43:34Z<p>Created page with 'SECTION: Survey scanning and performance. Reviewed by Leonardi Oct 2013. REVIEW: This section has been made public, and I think it is an important one. RECOMMENDATIONS: “The…'</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>SECTION: Survey scanning and performance. Reviewed by Leonardi Oct 2013.<br />
<br />
REVIEW: This section has been made public, and I think it is an important one.<br />
<br />
RECOMMENDATIONS:<br />
<br />
“The Planck focal plane scans the sky in the way explained in the figure below.”. The figure does not appear below the sentence on my browser. Please change the sentence.<br />
<br />
I don’t believe we need block “Data gap recoveries”. I would remove it. But I would probably retain the sentence “Throughout the Planck mission, data losses have been very rare. Small-Gap Recoveries have been applied only a couple of times.”<br />
<br />
In the block “Start and end of surveys”, we should say that LFI started Survey 9 but never completed it.<br />
<br />
In the block Main planet and Crab observations during Surveys” we should update this information (although we can wait for the next release to do so).<br />
<br />
In the references, I would remove the long list of co-authors of ref 3, and I would just cite Lamarre et al.</div>Rleonard