https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Grocha&feedformat=atom Planck PLA 2015 Wiki - User contributions [en-gb] 2023-12-02T01:49:05Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.31.6 https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6085 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:31:28Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=350px heights=350px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 600px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 600px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 600px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 600px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 600px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6083 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:30:20Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=350px heights=350px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 600px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 600px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=450px heights=450px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 600px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 600px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=6082 Beams LFI 2013-03-14T08:28:09Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 600px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> N times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:30.png| 600px| thumb | center| '''30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 600px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_030_GB.png| 600px| thumb | center| '''ellipticity - 30GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_030_GB.png| 600px| thumb | center| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 600px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=6072 Beams LFI 2013-03-14T08:19:48Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> N times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:30.png| 500px| thumb | center| '''30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_030_GB.png| 500px| thumb | center| '''ellipticity - 30GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_030_GB.png| 500px| thumb | center| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=6071 Beams LFI 2013-03-14T08:17:50Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> N times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 center caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2, center caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6069 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:14:41Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=300px heights=300px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> * The discontinuities at the Healpix domain edges in the maps are a visual artifact due to the interplay of the discretized effective beam and the Healpix pixel grid.<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=450px heights=450px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6068 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:09:28Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=350px heights=350px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=450px heights=450px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6066 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:07:21Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=300px heights=300px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_030_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 30GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_030_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_044_GB.pdf| 500px |'''ellipticity -44GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_044_GB.pdf| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 44GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_070_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 70GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_070_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 70GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_100_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 100GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_100_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_143_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 143GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_143_GB.png|500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 143GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_217_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 217GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_217_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 217GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_353_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 353GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_353_GB.png|500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 353GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_545_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 545GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_545_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 545GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_857_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 857GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_857_GB.png| 500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 857GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:E_044_GB.pdf&diff=6065 File:E 044 GB.pdf 2013-03-14T08:06:24Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6063 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:02:17Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=300px heights=300px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_030_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 30GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_030_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_044_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity -44GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_044_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 44GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_070_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 70GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_070_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 70GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_100_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 100GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_100_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_143_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 143GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_143_GB.png|500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 143GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_217_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 217GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_217_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 217GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_353_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 353GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_353_GB.png|500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 353GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_545_GB.png| 500px |'''ellipticity - 545GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_545_GB.png| 500px |'''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 545GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_857_GB.png|500px | '''ellipticity - 857GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_857_GB.png| 500px | '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 857GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6061 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T08:00:33Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=300px heights=300px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_044_GB.png| '''ellipticity -44GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_044_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 44GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_070_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 70GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_070_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 70GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_100_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_100_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_143_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 143GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_143_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 143GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_217_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 217GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_217_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 217GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_353_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 353GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_353_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 353GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:e_545_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 545GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_545_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 545GHz''']]<br /> <br /> [[File:e_857_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 857GHz''']]<br /> [[File:solidarc_857_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 857GHz''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6060 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:55:38Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for all LFI and HFI frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6059 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:54:20Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=300px heights=300px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6058 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:53:29Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6057 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:53:07Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=3 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6056 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:51:57Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow= caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:857.png&diff=6055 File:857.png 2013-03-14T07:50:48Z <p>Grocha: uploaded a new version of &quot;File:857.png&quot;</p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6054 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:49:46Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:30.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''30GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:44.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''44GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:70.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''70GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:100.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''100GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:143.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''143GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:217.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''217GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:353.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''353GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:545.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''545GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:857.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''857GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:217.png| '''217GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> File:857.png| '''857GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:545.png&diff=6053 File:545.png 2013-03-14T07:47:51Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:353.png&diff=6052 File:353.png 2013-03-14T07:46:52Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:217.png&diff=6051 File:217.png 2013-03-14T07:45:42Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:143.png&diff=6050 File:143.png 2013-03-14T07:44:34Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:70.png&diff=6049 File:70.png 2013-03-14T07:43:09Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:44.png&diff=6048 File:44.png 2013-03-14T07:41:51Z <p>Grocha: uploaded a new version of &quot;File:44.png&quot;</p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=File:44.png&diff=6047 File:44.png 2013-03-14T07:40:05Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div></div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6046 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:38:45Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:30.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''30GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:44.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''44GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:70.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''70GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:100.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''100GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:143.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''143GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:217.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''217GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:353.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''353GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:545.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''545GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> [[File:857.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''857GHz''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:213.png| '''213GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=6045 Effective Beams 2013-03-14T07:34:19Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:44.png| '''44GHz'''<br /> File:70.png| '''70GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> File:143.png| '''143GHz'''<br /> File:213.png| '''213GHz'''<br /> File:353.png| '''353GHz'''<br /> File:545.png| '''545GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5807 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T02:59:39Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> N times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5806 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T02:59:01Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5805 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T02:57:44Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz frequency channel, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 768 directions on the sky for LFI data. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5798 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T01:01:16Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5797 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T01:00:32Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5796 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T00:59:14Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Related products===<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5795 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T00:56:23Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> ---------------<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> -----------------------------------------<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> <br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> <br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ====Beam cutoff radii====<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> -----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> TBW<br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5794 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T00:53:54Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 <br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 <br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> 2.5 times the geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' <br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> TBW<br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5793 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T00:50:32Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Production process===<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)====<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ====effBeam====<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ====Computational Cost====<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Inputs===<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ====The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)====<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====The scanning strategy====<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ====The scanbeam====<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |}<br /> <br /> ====Map resolution for the derived beam data object====<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> TBW<br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Beams_LFI&diff=5792 Beams LFI 2013-03-13T00:46:27Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>== Overview ==<br /> <br /> LFI is observing the sky with 11 pairs of beams associated with the 22 pseudo-correlation radiometers.<br /> Each beam of the radiometer pair (Radiometer Chain Assembly - RCA) is named as LFIXXM or LFIXXS. XX is the RCA number ranging from 18 to 28; M and S are the two polarization namely main-arm and side-arm of the Orthomode transducers &lt;cite&gt;#darcangelo2009b&lt;/cite&gt; (see also [[LFI design, qualification, and performance#LFI Naming Convention|LFI naming convention]]). <br /> <br /> [[File:fieldofview.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. A sketch of the Planck LFI field of view in the (u,v) plane is shown. The polarization direction on the sky are highlighted by the colored arrows. The M-polarization is shown in green and the S-polarization in red. Main beam shapes are shown for completness and they are not representative of flight beams.]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;!--<br /> <br /> For the beam we consider these three regions:<br /> <br /> <br /> ; main beam: is the portion of the pattern that extends up to 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 degrees from the beam center at 30, 44, and 70 GHz, respectively.<br /> ; near sidelobes: is the pattern contained between the main beam angular limit and 5 degrees from the beam center (this is often called &lt;b&gt;intermediate beam&lt;/b&gt;).<br /> ; far sidelobes: is the pattern at angular regions more than 5 degrees from the beam center.<br /> --&gt;<br /> <br /> == Main Beams and Focal Plane calibration ==<br /> <br /> As the focal plane calibration we refer to the determination of the beam pointing parameters in the nominal Line of Sight (LOS) frame through main beam measurments using Jupiter transits. the parametes that characterise the beam pointing are the following:<br /> <br /> * THETA_UV ($\theta_{uv}$)<br /> * PHI_UV ($\phi_{uv}$)<br /> <br /> They are calculated starting from u,v coordinates derived form the beam reconstruction algorithm as <br /> <br /> $\theta_{uv} = \arcsin(u^2+v^2)$<br /> <br /> $\phi_{uv} = \arctan(v/u)$<br /> <br /> Two additional angles are used to characterize the beams in the RIMO: <br /> <br /> * PSI_UV ($\psi_{uv}$)<br /> * PSI_POL ($\psi_{pol}$)<br /> <br /> $\psi_{uv}$ and $\psi_{pol}$ are '''not''' derived from measurements but they are extimated form '''optical simulations'''. They are the quantities that represent the polarization direction of each beam, in the following approximation: '''the M- and S- beams of the same RCA point at the same direction on the sky'''.<br /> <br /> The main beams are characterised by 2 method: <br /> <br /> * elliptical (or bivariate) gaussian fit as in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2011-1-6]&lt;/cite&gt; with modification explained in &lt;cite&gt;#[planck2013-p02d]&lt;/cite&gt;. This method is used to determine <br /> **the beam centre<br /> **the average full width half maximum defined as $\sqrt{FWHM_{max}\cdot FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam ellipticity defined as $FWHM_{max}\over{FWHM_{min}}$<br /> **the beam tilting, $\psi_{ell}$, with respect the u-axis. <br /> <br /> * Electromagnetic simulation (using GRASP Physical Optics code) by appropriately tuning the Radio Frequency Flight Model (RFFM) &lt;cite&gt;#tauber2010b&lt;/cite&gt;. The Radio Frequency Tuned Model, called RFTM, was implemented to fit the beam data with electromagnetic model. It is derived as follow: <br /> **the Focal plane unit electromagnetic model has shifted by 3.5mm toward the secondary mirror;<br /> ** All the simulated beams where monochromatic, i.e calculated at a single frequency called Optical Center Frequency (OCF). For the RFTM model the OCF has been chosen at $28.0$, $44.0$, $70.0$. In fact the optical and radiometer bandshapes as reported in &lt;cite&gt;#zonca2009&lt;/cite&gt; demonstrates that for the 30 GHz channel, the radiometer responses are better described by a central frequency closer to 28 GHz with respect to the nominal one, whereas for the other two frequency channels the OCF is close to the nominal one.<br /> **each feed horn phase centre has been moved alogn horn axis to optimize the match between simulations and data. The optimization was obtained by minimizing the variance according to the following definition: If $B_s[u,v]$ is the peak-normalized scanning beam matrix (for semplicity we use here $(u,v)$ coordinates also as indexes of the beam matrix) and $B_o[u,v]$ is the smeared peak-normalized simulated GRASP beam, the variance, $\sigma$, can be evaluated for each beam: <br /> \begin{eqnarray}<br /> \label{eqsigma}<br /> \sigma &amp;=&amp; {\sum_{u,v}{(f[u,v] - \overline{f})^2}}\cdot {1\over N} \\<br /> f[u,v]&amp;=&amp;w[u,v] \cdot (B^{dB}_s(u,v)- B^{dB}_o(u,v)) \\<br /> w[u,v]&amp;=&amp;\sqrt{T[u,v]}<br /> \end{eqnarray} where also $T[u,v]$ is the temperature or the scanning beam not normalized to peak, and $N$ is the number of points considered in the comparison so that the number of point in the (u,v) plane. The parameter $\sigma$, as already said, is the variance of the difference between two beams weighted by the measured beam itself. For each beam the variance has computed computed down to $-15$dB from beam peak to avoid bias due to noise and background. The comparison between the simulated RFTM beams and the data are reported in &lt;cite&gt;#planck2013-p02d&lt;/cite&gt;<br /> <br /> == Effective beams ==<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=1 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> == Window Functions ==<br /> TBW<br /> <br /> == Sidelobes ==<br /> There is no direct measurements of sidelobes for LFI. The sidelobe pattern for LFI was been simulated using GRASP9 Multi-reflector GTD.<br /> We used the RFTM electromagnetic model. Seven beams for each radiometer have been computed in spherical polar cuts with a step of 0.5 degrees both in theta and phi.<br /> The beams have been computed in the same frames used for the main beams.<br /> The intermediate beam region (theta &lt; 5 degrees) has been replaced with null values.<br /> <br /> *In the computation we considered:<br /> **the direct field from the feed<br /> **the 1st order contributions: Bd, Br, Pd, Pr, Sd, Sr, Fr<br /> **the 2nd order contributions SrPd and SdPd <br /> <br /> where B=buffle', P=primary reflector, S=secondary reflector, F=Focal Plane Unit Box. <br /> and where d=diffraction, r=reflection.<br /> For example Br, means that we considered in the calculation the reflection on the telescope baffle system. <br /> <br /> A refinement of the sidelobes model will be considered in a future release, taking into account more contributions together with Physical Optics models.<br /> <br /> [[File:slb_lfi_30_27_y_tricromia.png|500px|thumb|centre|Figure 1. The image of the LFI27-M sidelobes is created as RGB picture where the red channel is the 27 GHz (f0), the green channel is the 30 GHz (f3), and the blue channel is the 33 GHz (f6). Because of the combined map does not show any wide white region, the sidelobe pattern change with frequency, as expected.]]<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt; <br /> #[[References]] <br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> [[Category:Data processing|0053]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5791 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:41:59Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5790 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:40:07Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> -----------------<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> ----------------<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> ------------------<br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5789 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:36:44Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels, as an example. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;)''' [degree] || '''mean(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5788 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:33:36Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity (e), orientation (&lt;math&gt; \psi&lt;/math&gt;) and beam solid angle, (&lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;), for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FWHM_eff are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(psi)''' [degree] || '''sd(psi)''' [degree] || '''mean(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5787 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:30:31Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity, orientation and beam solid angle, &lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;, for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 1024 and 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported &lt;math&gt;\text{FHWM}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; are derived from the beam solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. These are best used for flux determination while the the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps are more suited for source identification.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(psi)''' [degree] || '''sd(psi)''' [degree] || '''mean(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 32.34<br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 27.12<br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 13.31 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 9.66 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 7.27 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 5.01<br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 4.86<br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 4.84 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 4.63 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5786 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:23:52Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity, orientation and beam solid angle, &lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;, for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(psi)''' [degree] || '''sd(psi)''' [degree] || '''mean(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]<br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 <br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 <br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311<br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 <br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===FEBeCoP deliverables===<br /> <br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FHWM are derived from the solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. The value in the values in parenthesis are the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps tabulated above. The former is best used for flux determination, the latter for source identification.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> |-<br /> | '''Band''' || '''Omega_beam''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''Monte Carlo error'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;^] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''bias''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' (Gaussian fit) [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 1188.513 || --- || 0.842 || --- || 32.34 (32.24) <br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 832.946 || --- || 31.774 || --- || 27.12 (27.01) <br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 200.742 || --- || 1.027 || --- || 13.31 (13.25) <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.78 || --- || 0.31 || --- || 9.66 (9.65) <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.95 || --- || 0.25 || --- || 7.27 (7.25) <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.45 || --- || 0.27 || --- || 5.01 (4.99) <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.71 || --- || 0.25 || --- || 4.86 (4.82) <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.54 || --- || 0.34 || --- || 4.84 (4.68) <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.24 || --- || 0.19 || --- || 4.63 (4.33) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''&lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were used widely for the analysis of Planck data. A suite of simulations were rendered during the mission tagged as Full Focalplane simulations, FFP#.<br /> For example [[HL-sims#FFP6 data set|FFP6]] [<br /> <br /> ===Beam Window Functions===<br /> <br /> The '''Transfer Function''' or the '''Beam Window Function''' &lt;math&gt; W_l &lt;/math&gt; relates the true angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;C_l &lt;/math&gt; with the observed angular power spectra &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{C}_l &lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W_l= \widetilde{C}_l / C_l <br /> \label{eqn:wl1}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> Note that, the window function can contain a pixel window function (depending on the definition) and it is {\em not the angular power spectra of the scanbeams}, though, in principle, one may be able to connect them though fairly complicated algebra.<br /> <br /> The window functions are estimated by performing Monte-Carlo simulations. We generate several random realisations of the CMB sky starting from a given fiducial &lt;math&gt; C_l &lt;/math&gt;, convolve the maps with the pre-computed effective beams, compute the convolved power spectra &lt;math&gt; C^\text{conv}_l &lt;/math&gt;, divide by the power spectra of the unconvolved map &lt;math&gt;C^\text{in}_l &lt;/math&gt; and average over their ratio. Thus, the estimated window function<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> W^{est}_l = &lt; C^{conv}_l / C^{in}_l &gt;<br /> \label{eqn:wl2}&lt;/math&gt; <br /> <br /> For subtle reasons, we perform a more rigorous estimation of the window function by comparing C^{conv}_l with convolved power spectra of the input maps convolved with a symmetric Gaussian beam of comparable (but need not be exact) size and then scaling the estimated window function accordingly.<br /> <br /> Beam window functions are provided in the [[The RIMO#Beam Window Functions|RIMO]]. <br /> <br /> <br /> ====Beam Window functions, Wl, for Planck mission====<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_LFI_GB_pix.png | 500px | thumb | center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for LFI channels''']] <br /> [[File:plot_dx9_HFI_BS_M12_CMB.png | 500px | thumb | |center |'''Beam Window functions, Wl, for HFI channels''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ==File Names==<br /> <br /> The effective beams are stored as unformatted files in directories with the frequency channel's name, e.g., 100GHz, each subdirectory contains N unformatted files with names beams_###.unf, a beam_index.fits and a beams_run.log. For 100GHz and 143GHz: N=160, for 30, 44, 70 217 and 353GHz: N=128; for 545GHz: N=40; and 857GHz: N=32.<br /> <br /> * beam_index.fits<br /> * beams_run.log<br /> <br /> == Retrieval of effective beam information from the PLA interface ==<br /> <br /> In order to retrieve the effective beam information, the user should first launch the Java interface from this page:<br /> http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=planck&amp;page=Planck_Legacy_Archive<br /> <br /> One should click on &quot;Sky maps&quot; and then open the &quot;Effective beams&quot; area.<br /> There is the possibility to either retrieve one beam nearest to the input source (name or coordinates), or to retrieve a set of beams in a grid defined by the Nside and the size of the region around a source (name or coordinates).<br /> The resolution of this grid is defined by the Nside parameter.<br /> The size of the region is defined by the &quot;Radius of ROI&quot; parameter.<br /> <br /> Once the user proceeds with querying the beams, the PLA software retrieves the appropriate set of effective beams from the database and delivers it in a FITS file which can be directly downloaded.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Meta data==<br /> <br /> The data format of the effective beams is unformatted.<br /> <br /> == References ==<br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;biblio force=false&gt;<br /> #[[References]]<br /> &lt;/biblio&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> [[Category:Mission science products|004]]</div> Grocha https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla2015/index.php?title=Effective_Beams&diff=5785 Effective Beams 2013-03-13T00:21:14Z <p>Grocha: </p> <hr /> <div>&lt;span style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br /> <br /> ==Product description==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> The '''effective beam''' is the average of all scanning beams pointing at a certain direction within a given pixel of the sky map for a given scan strategy. It takes into account the coupling between azimuthal asymmetry of the beam and the uneven distribution of scanning angles across the sky.<br /> It captures the complete information about the difference between the true and observed image of the sky. They are, by definition, the objects whose convolution with the true CMB sky produce the observed sky map. <br /> <br /> The full algebra involving the effective beams for temperature and polarisation was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]] &lt;cite&gt;#mitra2010&lt;/cite&gt;. Here we summarise the main results. The observed temperature sky &lt;math&gt;\widetilde{\mathbf{T}} &lt;/math&gt; is a convolution of the true sky &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{T} &lt;/math&gt; and the effective beam &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}&lt;/math&gt;:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \widetilde{\mathbf{T}} \ = \ \Delta\Omega \, \mathbf{B} \cdot \mathbf{T},<br /> \label{eq:a0}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> B_{ij} \ = \ \left( \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \right) / \left({\sum_t A_{ti}} \right) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:EBT2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;t&lt;/math&gt; is time samples, &lt;math&gt;A_{ti}&lt;/math&gt; is &lt;math&gt;1&lt;/math&gt; if the pointing direction falls in pixel number &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, else it is &lt;math&gt;0&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{p}_t&lt;/math&gt; represents the exact pointing direction (not approximated by the pixel centre location), and &lt;math&gt;\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j&lt;/math&gt; is the centre of the pixel number &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt;, where the scanbeam &lt;math&gt;b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t)&lt;/math&gt; is being evaluated (if the pointing direction falls within the cut-off radius of &lt;math&gt;\sim 2.5 \times&lt;/math&gt; FWHM.<br /> <br /> The algebra is a bit more involved for polarised detectors. The observed stokes parameters at a pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, &lt;math&gt;(\widetilde{I}, \widetilde{Q}, \widetilde{U})_i&lt;/math&gt;, are related to the true stokes parameters &lt;math&gt;(I, Q, U)_i&lt;/math&gt;, by the following relation:<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> ( \widetilde{I} \quad \widetilde{Q} \quad \widetilde{U})_i^T \ = \ \Delta\Omega \sum_j \mathbf{B}_{ij} \cdot (I \quad Q \quad U)_j^T,<br /> \label{eq:a1}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> where the polarised effective beam matrix<br /> <br /> &lt;math&gt;<br /> \mathbf{B}_{ij} \ = \ \left[ \sum_t A_{tp} \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{w}^T_t \right]^{-1} \sum_t A_{ti} \, b(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, \mathbf{w}_t \mathbf{W}^T(\hat{\mathbf{n}}_j,\hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) \, ,<br /> \label{eq:a2}<br /> &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{w}_t &lt;/math&gt;and &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{W}(\hat{\mathbf{r}}_j, \hat{\mathbf{p}}_t) &lt;/math&gt; are the the polarisation weight vectors, as defined in \cite{mitra2010}.<br /> <br /> The task is to compute &lt;math&gt;B_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for temperature only beams and the &lt;math&gt;3 \times 3&lt;/math&gt; matrices &lt;math&gt;\mathbf{B}_{ij}&lt;/math&gt; for each pixel &lt;math&gt;i&lt;/math&gt;, at every neighbouring pixel &lt;math&gt;j&lt;/math&gt; that fall within the cut-off radius around the the center of the &lt;math&gt;i^\text{th}&lt;/math&gt; pixel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The effective beam is computed by stacking within a small field around each pixel of the HEALPix sky map. Due to the particular features of Planck scanning strategy coupled to the beam asymmetries in the focal plane, and data processing of the bolometer and radiometer TOIs, the resulting Planck effective beams vary over the sky. <br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, given information on Planck scanning beams and detector pointing during a mission period of interest, provides the pixelized stamps of both the Effective Beam, EB, and the Point Spread Function, PSF, at all positions of the HEALPix-formatted map pixel centres.<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Comparison of the images of compact sources observed by Planck with FEBeCoP products===<br /> <br /> We show here a comparison of the FEBeCoP derived effective beams, and associated point spread functions,PSF (the transpose of the beam matrix), to the actual images of a few compact sources observed by Planck, for 30GHz and 100GHz frequency channels. We show below a few panels of source images organized as follows:<br /> * Row #1- DX9 images of four ERCSC objects with their galactic (l,b) coordinates shown under the color bar<br /> * Row #2- linear scale FEBeCoP PSFs computed using input scanning beams, Grasp Beams, GB, for LFI and B-Spline beams,BS, Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and the BS Mars12 for the sub-mm channels, for HFI (see section Inputs below).<br /> * Row #3- log scale of #2; PSF iso-contours shown in solid line, elliptical Gaussian fit iso-contours shown in broken line<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=500px heights=500px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Comparison images of compact sources and effective beams, PSFs&quot;&gt;<br /> File:30.png| '''30GHz'''<br /> File:100.png| '''100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ===Histograms of the effective beam parameters===<br /> <br /> Here we present histograms of the three fit parameters - beam FWHM, ellipticity, and orientation with respect to the local meridian and of the beam solid angle. The shy is sampled (pretty sparsely) at 3072 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=16 pixel centers for HFI and at 768 directions which were chosen as HEALpix nside=8 pixel centers for LFI to uniformly sample the sky.<br /> <br /> Where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: '''4pi* sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam)'''<br /> ie &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:ist_GB.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for LFI effective beam parameters''' ]] <br /> [[File:ist_BS_Mars12.png | 500px| thumb | center| '''Histograms for HFI effective beam parameters''' ]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian===<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> &lt;gallery widths=400px heights=400px perrow=2 caption=&quot;Sky variation of effective beams solid angle and ellipticity of the best-fit Gaussian&quot;&gt;<br /> File:e_030_GB.png| '''ellipticity - 30GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_030_GB.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 30GHz'''<br /> File:e_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''ellipticity - 100GHz'''<br /> File:solidarc_100_BS_Mars12.png| '''beam solid angle (relative variations wrt scanning beam - 100GHz'''<br /> &lt;/gallery&gt;<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Statistics of the effective beams computed using FEBeCoP===<br /> <br /> We tabulate the simple statistics of FWHM, ellipticity, orientation and beam solid angle, &lt;math&gt; \Omega &lt;/math&gt;, for a sample of 3072 and 768 directions on the sky for HFI and LFI data respectively. Statistics shown in the Table are derived from the histograms shown above.<br /> <br /> <br /> {| border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Statistics of the FEBeCoP Effective Beams Computed with the BS Mars12 apodized for the CMB channels and oversampled'''<br /> |-<br /> ! '''frequency''' || '''mean(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''sd(fwhm)''' [arcmin] || '''mean(e)''' || '''sd(e)''' || '''mean(psi)''' [degree] || '''sd(psi)''' [degree] || '''mean(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''sd(Solid Angle)''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]<br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 32.239 || 0.013 || 1.320 || 0.031 || -0.304 || 55.349 || 1189.513 || 0.842 <br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 27.005 || 0.552 || 1.034 || 0.033 || 0.059 || 53.767 || 832.946 || 31.774 <br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 13.252 || 0.033 || 1.223 || 0.026 || 0.587 || 55.066 || 200.742 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 9.651 || 0.014 || 1.186 || 0.023 || -0.024 || 55.400 || 105.778 || 0.311<br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 7.248 || 0.015 || 1.036 || 0.009 || 0.383 || 54.130 || 59.954 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 4.990 || 0.025 || 1.177 || 0.030 || 0.836 || 54.999 || 28.447 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 4.818 || 0.024 || 1.147 || 0.028 || 0.655 || 54.745 || 26.714 || 0.250 <br /> |- <br /> | 545 || 4.682 || 0.044 || 1.161 || 0.036 || 0.544 || 54.876 || 26.535 || 0.339 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 4.325 || 0.055 || 1.393 || 0.076 || 0.876 || 54.779 || 24.244 || 0.193 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> ----<br /> ===FEBeCoP deliverables===<br /> <br /> <br /> * The derived beam parameters are representative of the DPC NSIDE 2048 healpix maps (they include the pixel window function).<br /> * The reported FHWM are derived from the solid angles, under a Gaussian approximation. The value in the values in parenthesis are the Gaussian fits to the effective beam maps tabulated above. The former is best used for flux determination, the latter for source identification.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ '''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> |-<br /> | '''Band''' || '''Omega_beam''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''Monte Carlo error'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;^] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''bias''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''FWHM_eff''' (Gaussian fit) [arcmin] <br /> |-<br /> | 030 || 1188.513 || --- || 0.842 || --- || 32.34 (32.24) <br /> |-<br /> | 044 || 832.946 || --- || 31.774 || --- || 27.12 (27.01) <br /> |-<br /> | 070 || 200.742 || --- || 1.027 || --- || 13.31 (13.25) <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.78 || --- || 0.31 || --- || 9.66 (9.65) <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.95 || --- || 0.25 || --- || 7.27 (7.25) <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.45 || --- || 0.27 || --- || 5.01 (4.99) <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.71 || --- || 0.25 || --- || 4.86 (4.82) <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.54 || --- || 0.34 || --- || 4.84 (4.68) <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.24 || --- || 0.19 || --- || 4.63 (4.33) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> ====Beam solid angles for the PCCS====<br /> <br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; - is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam, where beam solid angle is estimated according to the definition: 4pi*sum(effbeam)/max(effbeam), i.e. as an integral over the full extent of the effective beam, i.e. &lt;math&gt; 4 \pi \sum(B_{ij}) / max(B_{ij}) &lt;/math&gt;.<br /> <br /> ** from &lt;math&gt;\Omega_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; we estimate the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;, under a Gaussian approximation - these are tabulated above<br /> ** &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(1)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; is the beam solid angle estimated up to a radius equal to one &lt;math&gt;fwhm_\text{eff}&lt;/math&gt; and &lt;math&gt;\Omega^{(2)}_{eff}&lt;/math&gt; up to a radius equal to twice the &lt;math&gt;fwhm_{eff}&lt;/math&gt;.<br /> *** These were estimated according to the procedure followed in the aperture photometry code for the PCCS: if the pixel centre does not lie within the given radius it is not included (so inclusive=0 in query disc).<br /> <br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Band averaged beam solid angles'''<br /> | '''Band''' || '''Omega_eff'''[arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''Omega_eff_1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;]|| '''spatial variation-1''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''Omega_eff_2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] || '''spatial variation-2''' [arcmin&lt;math&gt;^{2}&lt;/math&gt;] <br /> |-<br /> |30 || 1189.513 || 0.842 || 1116.494 || 2.274 || 1188.945 || 0.847 <br /> |-<br /> | 44 || 832.946 || 31.774 || 758.684 || 29.701 || 832.168 || 31.811 <br /> |-<br /> | 70 || 200.742 || 1.027 || 186.260 || 2.300 || 200.591 || 1.027 <br /> |-<br /> | 100 || 105.778 || 0.311 || 100.830 || 0.410 || 105.777 || 0.311 <br /> |-<br /> | 143 || 59.954 || 0.246 || 56.811 || 0.419 || 59.952 || 0.246 <br /> |-<br /> | 217 || 28.447 || 0.271 || 26.442 || 0.537 || 28.426 || 0.271 <br /> |-<br /> | 353 || 26.714 || 0.250 || 24.827 || 0.435 || 26.653 || 0.250 <br /> |-<br /> | 545 || 26.535 || 0.339 || 24.287 || 0.455 || 26.302 || 0.337 <br /> |-<br /> | 857 || 24.244 || 0.193 || 22.646 || 0.263 || 23.985 || 0.191 <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ==Production process==<br /> ------------------------<br /> <br /> The methodology for computing effective beams for a scanning CMB experiment like Planck<br /> was presented in [[http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.1929| Mitra, Rocha, Gorski et al.]].<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP, or Fast Effective Beam Convolution in Pixel space, is an approach to representing and computing effective beams (including both intrinsic beam shapes and the effects of scanning) that comprises the following steps:<br /> * identify the individual detectors' instantaneous optical response function (presently we use elliptical Gaussian fits of Planck beams from observations of planets; eventually, an arbitrary mathematical representation of the beam can be used on input)<br /> * follow exactly the Planck scanning, and project the intrinsic beam on the sky at each actual sampling position<br /> * project instantaneous beams onto the pixelized map over a small region (typically &lt;2.5 FWHM diameter)<br /> * add up all beams that cross the same pixel and its vicinity over the observing period of interest<br /> *create a data object of all beams pointed at all N'_pix_' directions of pixels in the map at a resolution at which this precomputation was executed (dimension N'_pix_' x a few hundred)<br /> *use the resulting beam object for very fast convolution of all sky signals with the effective optical response of the observing mission<br /> <br /> <br /> Computation of the effective beams at each pixel for every detector is a challenging task for high resolution experiments. FEBeCoP is an efficient algorithm and implementation which enabled us to compute the pixel based effective beams using moderate computational resources. The algorithm used different mathematical and computational techniques to bring down the computation cost to a practical level, whereby several estimations of the effective beams were possible for all Planck detectors for different scanbeam models and different lengths of datasets. <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA)===<br /> <br /> The main challenge in computing the effective beams is to go through the trillion samples, which gets severely limited by I/O. In the first stage, for a given dataset, ordered lists of pointing angles for each pixels---the Pixel Ordered Detector Angles (PODA) are made. This is an one-time process for each dataset. We used computers with large memory and used tedious memory management bookkeeping to make this step efficient.<br /> <br /> ===effBeam===<br /> <br /> The effBeam part makes use of the precomputed PODA and unsynchronized reading from the disk to compute the beam. Here we tried to made sure that no repetition occurs in evaluating a trigonometric quantity.<br /> <br /> <br /> One important reason for separating the two steps is that they use different schemes of parallel computing. The PODA part requires parallelisation over time-order-data samples, while the effBeam part requires distribution of pixels among different computers.<br /> <br /> <br /> ===Computational Cost===<br /> <br /> The whole computation of the effective beams has been performed at the NERSC Supercomputing Center. In the table below it isn displayed the computation cost on NERSC for nominal mission both in terms of CPU hrs and in Human time.<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+ Computational cost for PODA, Effective Beam and single map convolution.The cost in Human time is computed using an arbitrary number of nodes/core on Carver or Hopper NERSC Supercomputers<br /> |-<br /> |Channel ||030 || 044 || 070 || 100 || 143 || 217 || 353 || 545 || 857<br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (CPU hrs) || 85 || 100 || 250 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 || 500 <br /> |-<br /> |PODA/Detector Computation time (Human minutes) || 7 || 10 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20 || 20<br /> |- <br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (CPU hrs) || 900 || 2000 || 2300 || 2800 || 3800 || 3200 || 3000 || 900 || 1100<br /> |-<br /> |Beam/Channel Computation time (Human hrs) || 0.5 || 0.8 || 1 || 1.5 || 2 || 1.2 || 1 || 0.5 || 0.5<br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (CPU hr) || 1 || 1.2 || 1.3 || 3.6 || 4.8 || 4.0 || 4.1 || 4.1 || 3.7 <br /> |-<br /> |Convolution Computation time (Human sec) || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 <br /> |-<br /> |Effective Beam Size (GB) || 173 || 123 || 28 || 187 || 182 || 146 || 132 || 139 || 124<br /> |}<br /> <br /> <br /> The computation cost, especially for PODA and Convolution, is heavily limited by the I/O capacity of the disc and so it depends on the overall usage of the cluster done by other users.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ==Inputs==<br /> ------------<br /> <br /> In order to fix the convention of presentation of the scanning and effective beams, we show the classic view of the Planck focal plane as seen by the incoming CMB photon. The scan direction is marked, and the toward the center of the focal plane is at the 85 deg angle w.r.t spin axis pointing upward in the picture. <br /> <br /> <br /> [[File:PlanckFocalPlane.png | 500px| thumb | center| &quot;'Planck Focal Plane''']]<br /> <br /> <br /> ===The Focal Plane DataBase (FPDB)===<br /> <br /> The FPDB contains information on each detector, e.g., the orientation of the polarisation axis, different weight factors, ... (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]]):<br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> <br /> <br /> {{PLADoc|fileType=rimo|link=The Plank RIMOS}}<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===The scanning strategy===<br /> <br /> The scanning strategy, the three pointing angle for each detector for each sample: Detector pointings for the nominal mission covers about 15 months of observation from Operational Day (OD) 91 to OD 563 covering 3 surveys and half.<br /> <br /> ===The scanbeam===<br /> <br /> The scanbeam modeled for each detector through the observation of planets. Which was assumed to be constant over the whole mission, though FEBeCoP could be used for a few sets of scanbeams too.<br /> <br /> * LFI: [[Beams LFI#Main beams and Focalplane calibration|GRASP scanning beam]] - the scanning beams used are based on Radio Frequency Tuned Model (RFTM) smeared to simulate the in-flight optical response. <br /> * HFI: [[Pointing&amp;Beams#Scanning beams|B-Spline, BS]] based on 2 observations of Mars.<br /> <br /> (see the instrument [[The RIMO|RIMOs]])<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *HFI - LFI_RIMO_DX9_PTCOR6 - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=HFI_RIMO_R1.00.fits|link=The HFI RIMO}}<br /> *LFI - HFI-RIMO-3_16_detilt_t2_ptcor6.fits - {{PLASingleFile|fileType=rimo|name=LFI_RIMO_R1.12.fits|link=The LFI RIMO}}<br /> [[Beams LFI#Effective beams|LFI effective beams]]<br /> <br /> ===Beam cutoff radii===<br /> <br /> N times geometric mean of FWHM of all detectors in a channel, where N<br /> <br /> {|border=&quot;1&quot; cellpadding=&quot;5&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center&quot;<br /> |+'''Beam cut off radius'''<br /> | '''channel''' || '''Cutoff Radii in units of fwhm''' || '''fwhm of full beam extent''' <br /> |-<br /> |30 - 44 - 70 || 2.5 ||<br /> |-<br /> |100 || 2.25 || 23.703699<br /> |-<br /> |143 || 3 || 21.057402<br /> |-<br /> |217-353 || 4 || 18.782754<br /> |-<br /> |sub-mm || 4 || 18.327635(545GHz) ; 17.093706(857GHz) <br /> |}<br /> <br /> ===Map resolution for the derived beam data object===<br /> <br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 1024 &lt;/math&gt; for LFI frequency channels<br /> * &lt;math&gt;N_{side} = 2048 &lt;/math&gt; for HFI frequency channels<br /> <br /> <br /> ==Related products==<br /> ----------------------<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ===Monte Carlo simulations===<br /> <br /> FEBeCoP software enables fast, full-sky convolutions of the sky signals with the Effective beams in pixel domain. Hence, a large number of Monte Carlo simulations of the sky signal maps map convolved with realistically rendered, spatially varying, asymmetric Planck beams can be easily generated. We performed the following steps:<br /> <br /> * generate the effective beams with FEBeCoP for all frequencies for dDX9 data and Nominal Mission<br /> * generate 100 realizations of maps from a fiducial CMB power spectrum<br /> * convolve each one of these maps with the effective beams using FEBeCoP<br /> * estimate the average of the Power Spectrum of each convolved realization, C'_\ell_'^out^'}, and 1 sigma errors<br /> <br /> <br /> As FEBeCoP enables fast convolutions of the input signal sky with the effective beam, thousands of simulations are generated. These Monte Carlo simulations of the signal (might it be CMB or a foreground (e.g. dust)) sky along with LevelS+Madam noise simulations were