Difference between revisions of "Survey scanning and performance"

From Planck PLA Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Data gap recoveries)
 
(103 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
=== The observation strategy ===
+
== The observation strategy ==
  
−
The Planck observation strategy, or scanning strategy, makes use of the characteristics of the Planck spacecraft and orbit in order to achieve the survey goals in terms of sky coverage and scanning directions.
+
The Planck ''observation strategy'', or ''scanning strategy'', makes use of the characteristics of the Planck spacecraft {{PlanckPapers|planck2011-1-1}} and orbit in order to achieve the survey goals in terms of sky coverage and scanning directions.
  
 
The Planck focal plane scans the sky in the way explained in the figure below.
 
The Planck focal plane scans the sky in the way explained in the figure below.
  
−
[[file:FocalPlane.png]]
+
[[file:FocalPlane.png|thumb|300px|The Planck focal plane with the direction of scanning. Polarization-sensitive detectors are drawn with crosses indicating the polarization direction.]]
  
 
The 353 GHz row scans the sky in small circles with a 85 deg. bore-sight angle from the spin axis. 545 GHz, 857 GHz, 143 GHz bolometers as well as LFI 25-26 radiometers have a slightly smaller bore-sight angle, while the other part of the Planck focal plane have larger ones (up to ~ 89 deg.). The Planck spacecraft spins at a rate of 1 rpm.
 
The 353 GHz row scans the sky in small circles with a 85 deg. bore-sight angle from the spin axis. 545 GHz, 857 GHz, 143 GHz bolometers as well as LFI 25-26 radiometers have a slightly smaller bore-sight angle, while the other part of the Planck focal plane have larger ones (up to ~ 89 deg.). The Planck spacecraft spins at a rate of 1 rpm.
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Planck, being at L2, moves along the Ecliptic at ~ one degree per day, and needs to keep the Solar aspect angle below ~ 9 degrees at all times. In practice, during the surveys, the limit considered is 8 deg. Another celestial constraint is that the angle between the Planck spin axis and the anti-Earth direction cannot exceed 15 deg. (relaxed to 17 deg. from Survey 5 onward). These constraints have a very direct influence on the chosen scanning strategy.
 
Planck, being at L2, moves along the Ecliptic at ~ one degree per day, and needs to keep the Solar aspect angle below ~ 9 degrees at all times. In practice, during the surveys, the limit considered is 8 deg. Another celestial constraint is that the angle between the Planck spin axis and the anti-Earth direction cannot exceed 15 deg. (relaxed to 17 deg. from Survey 5 onward). These constraints have a very direct influence on the chosen scanning strategy.
  
−
[[File:ScannStrategy.png]]
+
[[File:ScannStrategy.png|thumb|300px|Simplified way to show the Planck scanning strategy, without additional motion of the spin axis]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Observing_strat.png|thumb|300px|left|The Planck scanning strategy with the additional motion of the spin axis.]]
  
 
The path followed by the Planck spin axis is defined with respect to the Ecliptic plane. It corresponds to a motion in longitude which maintains an anti-Sun pointing (about one degree per day), to which is added a cycloidal motion (precession) of the spin axis around the anti-Sun position (fiducial point). The cycloidal path is defined by the following functions:  
 
The path followed by the Planck spin axis is defined with respect to the Ecliptic plane. It corresponds to a motion in longitude which maintains an anti-Sun pointing (about one degree per day), to which is added a cycloidal motion (precession) of the spin axis around the anti-Sun position (fiducial point). The cycloidal path is defined by the following functions:  
  
−
* λ = θ sin((-1)n ω(t-t0) + φ) (eq. 1)
+
$ λ = θ sin((-1)^n ω (t-t_0)+φ) $ (eq. 1)
  
−
* β = -θ cos((-1)n ω(t-t0) + φ) (eq. 2)
+
$β = -θ cos((-1)^n ω(t-t_0) + φ) $ (eq. 2)
  
−
where λ is the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic longitude, β the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic latitude, θ the spin axis precession amplitude, ω the pulsation of the precession, φ its phase, n the parameter which controls the motion direction of the precession, t is the time, and t0 is the first time during the Planck survey at which the fiducial point crosses the 0 Ecliptic longitude line.
+
where λ is the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic longitude, β the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic latitude, θ the spin axis precession amplitude, ω the pulsation of the precession, φ its phase, n the parameter which controls the motion direction of the precession, t is the time, and $t_0$ is the first time during the Planck survey at which the fiducial point crosses the 0 Ecliptic longitude line.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Cycloidal_scanning.JPG|thumb|300px|Spin axis path with a 7 degree amplitude cycloidal scanning, from {{BibCite|dupac2005}}]]
  
 
The reasons to decide to use such a precession of the spin axis are the following :
 
The reasons to decide to use such a precession of the spin axis are the following :
Line 29: Line 33:
 
The following precession parameters have been chosen for the BSS:
 
The following precession parameters have been chosen for the BSS:
  
−
* amplitude θ = 7.5 deg. (this value is the lowest possible which allows to cover the whole sky with all detectors)
+
* amplitude $θ = 7.5^o$ (this value is the lowest possible which allows to cover the whole sky with all detectors)
  
 
* n = 1 (anti-clockwise motion as seen from the Sun)
 
* n = 1 (anti-clockwise motion as seen from the Sun)
  
−
* pulsation ω = 2π / (half a year)
+
* pulsation ω = 2π / (half a year). Faster precession was considered, and has interesting advantages, but is not possible given the constraints if one wants to keep a 7.5 deg. amplitude (which is necessary to cover the whole sky).
 +
 
 +
* The phase of the precession was decided according to this set of criteria (in order of importance):
 +
 
 +
a) respecting the operational constraints,
  
−
* The phase of the precession was decided according to this set of criteria (in order of importance): a) respecting the operational constraints, b) allowing the largest possible angle between two scans on the Crab, c) avoiding null dipole amplitude for the whole mission, d) optimizing the position of the planets in the beginning of the survey and with respect to the feasibility of their recovery, e) placing the two “deep fields” where Galactic foregrounds are minimum, f) allowing a reasonable survey margin
+
b) allowing the largest possible angle between two scans on the Crab,
 +
 
 +
c) avoiding null dipole amplitude for the whole mission,
 +
 
 +
d) optimizing the position of the planets in the beginning of the survey and with respect to the feasibility of their recovery,
 +
 
 +
e) placing the two “deep fields” where Galactic foregrounds are minimum,
 +
 
 +
f) allowing a reasonable survey margin (i.e. the time allowed to recover lost pointings if a problem occurs)
 +
 
 +
The phase is 340 deg. for Surveys 1 to 4, and 250 deg. for Surveys 5 to 8.
 +
 
 +
The scanning strategy for the second year of Routine Operations (i.e. Surveys 3 and 4) is exactly the same as for the first year, except that all pointings are shifted by 1 arcmin along the cross-scanning direction, in order to provide finer sky sampling for the highest frequency detectors when combining two years of observations.
 +
 
 +
The change of phase between Survey 4 and Survey 5 occurred because it was found essential especially on the HFI side that scanning direction crossings are increased in the Planck survey. By choosing a phase 90 deg. away from the original one, one optimizes the scanning strategy in this respect.
  
 
The details of the justifications for these parameters can be found in PL-WG9-TN-001.
 
The details of the justifications for these parameters can be found in PL-WG9-TN-001.
  
−
The phase is 340 deg. for Surveys 1 to 4, and 250 deg. for Surveys 5 to 8. The change of phase between Survey 4 and Survey 5 occurred because it was found essential especially on the HFI side that scanning direction crossings are increased in the Planck survey. By choosing a phase 90 deg. away from the original one, one optimizes the scanning strategy in this respect.
+
The scanning strategy parameters are input to the PSO Survey Planning and Performance Tool, which is the software which generates the series of pointing records to be sent out to MOC for implementation.
 +
 
 +
An approximate visualisation of the Planck scanning strategy can be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwFXuZ0B3B8 here] and [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Zu-aiEiDtY here].
 +
 
 +
===Spin axis manoeuvres and exact pointings===
 +
The motion of the spin axis is not continuous. Every change in the spin axis position is initiated by a manoeuvre which requires less than 5 minutes time to complete.  
 +
 
 +
The duration between spin-axis manoeuvres is hereafter referred to as “dwelling times"; and the angular distance between manoeuvres along the spin axis path is hereafter referred to as “spacing”.  
 +
 
 +
The dwelling times and spacings are defined as follows:
 +
 
 +
* The spacings are fixed to 2’ which roughly corresponds to Nyquist criterion for sampling the highest-frequency HFI detectors.
  
−
The scanning strategy parameters are input to the PSO Survey Planning and Performance Tool, which is the software which generates the series of pointing records to be sent out to MOC for implementation.
+
* The dwell times vary from 2360 s to 3904 s.
 +
The exact series of coordinates and dwell times are set by equations 1 and 2 when one has fixed the spacings.
 +
 
 +
== Data gap recoveries ==
 +
 
 +
Gaps in the data flow can occur because of various reasons:
 +
 
 +
* Anomalies may occur at spacecraft or instrument level, but also due to failures in the ground-to-spacecraft link or the ground segment itself. The adverse effects of such anomalies may be the loss of scientific data corresponding to one or several planned pointings, which have either not been acquired and/or stored in memory.
 +
 
 +
* Failure to acquire proper scientific data may occur to one or both instruments
 +
 
 +
In case a gap occurs, scientific criteria are applied to decide whether to recover the data through the Small-Gap Recovery procedure.
 +
 
 +
[[File:AHF_353_OD389.png|thumb|400px|The 353 GHz detectors {{PlanckPapers|lamarre2010}} integration time after 389 Operational Days (the unit is seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector). The first significant data gap and recovery are clearly visible.]]
 +
 
 +
The Small-Gap Recovery (SGR) procedure can be applied by MOC or PSO:
 +
 
 +
* '''MOC-triggered SGR''': Within its nominal scheduling procedure for an OD, the MOC searches the PPL for PREF corresponding to the OD being processed and any pointings which are subject of a Small Gap Recovery. As the PREF are sorted in chronological order according to their nominal start time, those corresponding to a small gap will naturally be the earliest. After checking attitude constraints, all observable pointings are listed and their dwell times reduced (initially) to the Minimum Dwell Time (MDT) as given in the PPL.
 +
Having included all valid PREF the required slew times are calculated. With the required slew times and minimum dwell times for all pointings, the OD schedule may be under-populated; in this case the dwell times of all scheduled pointings will be increased equally to make use of all available time in the OD. If the resulting schedule is over-populated, even with MDT for all pointings, the recovery cannot be constrained to a single OD. The sequence of pointings for the ODs involved will be optimized in PREF scheduling and dwell times in order to effect the recovery and revert to the nominal timeline as quickly as possible.
 +
 
 +
* '''PSO-triggered SGR''':
 +
PSO declares a small gap when pointings that have been executed result in data of insufficient quality or inadequate frequency coverage. This assessment is based on data quality and instrument health information provided by the DPCs. The algorithm that is used by the PSO to check the scientific validity of a pointing is implemented within the SPPT software tool. The SPPT ingests on a weekly basis a Weekly Health Report (WHR) for the HFI and LFI containing information on the current working status of each detector and their expected condition over the next four weeks. On a daily basis, a Daily Quality Report (DQR) provided by the DPCs for both instruments, includes a set of parameters that describe the quality of the detection achieved by each individual detector for every pointing executed.
  
 +
The scheme for declaring a Small-Gap Recovery from PSO is the following:
  
−
=== Launch date and start of Survey Operations ===
+
- If a pointing fails to meet the chosen requirement, it becomes an SGR candidate
  
−
The definition of the BSS is mostly independent of the launch date and the start date of survey operations. However, since the definition of the Planck orbit around L2 depends on the launch date, this can affect the choice of a few parameters of the scanning strategy. Indeed, not all precession phases are allowed for all launch dates (see below). Once the launch date is known, the start date of the survey operations does not influence the scanning strategy parameters.
+
- If there are at least 12 consecutive pointings which are declared SGR candidates, and the problem has been identified and solved, then an SGR is triggered
 +
Recoveries are only carried out if the recovery slewing out is guaranteed to be in OCM. MOC carries out this analysis and decides whether they perform the SGR accordingly.
  
 +
- The start and end times of the gap and the list of the pointing numbers (or just the numbers of the first and last pointings to be recovered) are then sent to MOC by E-mail, with the notification to start a Small-Gap Recovery
  
 +
- MOC implements the Small-Gap Recovery, provided the pointings can still be scheduled with respect to their latest start time, using the same scheme as described in the MOC-triggered SGR section
  
 +
Throughout the Planck mission, data losses have been very rare. Small-Gap Recovery has been applied only a couple of times.
  
−
=== Spin axis manoeuvres and exact pointings ===
+
==Special observations==
 +
The special observations are:
  
−
The motion of the spin axis is not continuous. Every change in the spin axis position will be initiated by a manoeuvre which requires less than 5 minutes of time to be completed.
+
* normal scanning on Solar System objects for calibration purposes
  
−
The duration between spin-axis manoeuvres is hereafter referred to as “dwell times”; and the angular distance between manoeuvres along the spin axis path is hereafter referred to as “spacings”.
+
[[File:Crab_Nebula.jpg|thumb|200px|The Crab Nebula (Messier 1, NGC 1952, Taurus A), here seen by the Hubble Space Telescope]]
  
−
The dwell times and spacings for the BSS are defined as follows:
+
[[File:Mars.jpg|thumb|200px|Mars as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1999]]
−
• The spacings are fixed to 2’. This is a parameter entered into the Survey Planning & Performance Tool.
 
−
• The dwell times vary from 2360 s to 3904 s.
 
−
The exact coordinates and dwell times are set by equations 1 and 2 when one has fixed the spacings.
 
  
 +
This concerns the following objects (planets): Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune whose thermal emission in the far-infrared and their point-source-like quality make them essential calibrators for spider-web bolometers and radiometers.
  
−
===Special observations===
+
Mars is a particularly interesting calibrator for Planck because of its proper motion.
 +
However this proper motion makes it difficult to observe it many times during the mission.
  
−
The special observations which can be foreseen in advance and integrated in the long-term pointing plan are listed in the Science Operations Plan for the Routine Phase:
+
Jupiter is the brightest source for (non-polarized) calibration. Saturn is also used a lot, and Uranus and Neptune are secondary calibrators.
  
−
* special scanning on Solar System objects for calibration purposes
+
* normal scanning on other (non-moving) sources for calibration purposes
−
This will concern the following objects (planets): Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.
 
−
The Baseline Scanning Strategy will be maintained, but a special case will be set for Small-Gap Recovery algorithm application (see Planck/PSO/2005-016).
 
  
−
* special scanning on other (non-moving) sources (Galactic plane, etc) for calibration purposes
+
This concerns mostly the Crab Nebula for polarizer calibration purposes.
−
This will concern mostly the Crab Nebula for polarization calibration purposes. Two scans with scanning angles separated by at least 12 degrees will be performed. This will be achieved by adequately choosing the initial precession phase.
+
This supernova remnant is highly polarized and as such represents the main polarization calibrator for Planck.
  
 
* special pointings during the calibration phase, not relative to celestial sources
 
* special pointings during the calibration phase, not relative to celestial sources
  
 +
* "deep rings" : these special observations are performed on each passage of Jupiter and the Crab Nebula, from January 2012 onward.
 +
 +
They consist of very deeply sampled observations (0.5') with the spin axis along the Ecliptic plane, during typically two to three weeks.
 +
 +
These observations benefit from special relaxing of the celestial constraints with Solar Aspect Angles < 9 deg. rather than < 8 deg. during cycloidal surveying.
 +
 +
* "drift scans" : these special observations are performed on Mars, making use of its proper motion
 +
 +
==Start and end of surveys==
 +
 +
The completion of a given “survey” is declared when the logical AND of all frequency-coverage maps is greater than 95 %, OR the sky has been surveyed over a consecutive period of 7.5 months. Note that this definition is that of the Project Scientist and Planck Science Office. Data Processing Centres do not use the same concept of surveys to create "survey" maps.
 +
 +
In practice, since the gaps during the surveys have always been very small, it results in ~ six months per survey.
 +
 +
[[File:PlanckMissionTimeline.JPG|thumb|300px|The Planck mission timeline with the distribution of the "sky surveys".]]
 +
 +
* '''Survey 1''': starts August 13, 2009, ends Feb. 13, 2010
 +
 +
* '''Survey 2''': starts Feb. 14, 2010, ends Aug. 13, 2010
  
 +
* '''Survey 3''': starts Aug. 14, 2010, ends Feb. 13, 2011
  
−
(*) The 1-N thrusters problems make it more difficult to recover gaps, since the 20-N thrusters must now be used to initiate a recovery. During roughly half of the year (in two 3-month periods), the recovery is not feasible because the margin with respect to the celestial constraints is too small. Therefore, we try to optimize the cycloid phase in order to have the most important planets in a recoverable area.
+
* '''Survey 4''': starts Feb. 14, 2011, ends July 29th, 2011
  
 +
This survey was shortened in ordered to start earlier with the new scanning strategy (see above).
  
−
===The survey requirements and survey goals===
+
* '''Survey 5''': starts July 29th, 2011, ends January 30th, 2012
  
−
The survey requirements are numbers which are required to be achieved at the end of the Planck nominal mission.
+
* '''Survey 6''' (LFI only): starts January 30th, 2012, ends July 31st, 2012
−
They correspond to the values obtained from 12 months of observation, with the sensitivity which is measured in-flight during CPV phase.
 
−
The survey requirements are the following:
 
  
−
* mean integration time over the sky, in seconds / square degree
+
* '''Survey 7''' (LFI only): starts July 31st, 2012, ends January 31st, 2013
  
−
* percentile of sky not observed
+
* '''Survey 8''' (LFI only): starts February 1st, 2013, ends August 1st, 2013
  
−
* percentile of sky below half mean integration time
 
  
−
* percentile of sky above four times mean integration time
+
=== Completion of full sky coverage during Surveys 1-2 ===
  
−
* percentile of sky above nine times mean integration time (i.e. “deep fields”)
+
The picture gallery below exhibits the progress of sky coverage during the first months of survey (black color = unobserved areas).
  
−
* percentile of sky in which coverage suffers from sharp gradients (> 500 in grad(sec/deg2) )
 
  
−
* percentile of sky in which scanning directions are at least 5 over 16
+
<gallery widths=330 perrow=3 caption="The HFI 353 GHz integration time after N months of survey. Unit is seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector.">
 +
File:353_1month.png|After 1 month
 +
File:353_2month.png|After 2 months
 +
File:353_3month.png|After 3 months
 +
File:353_4month.png|After 4 months
 +
File:353_5month.png|After 5 months
 +
File:353_6month.png|After 6 months
 +
File:353_7month.png|After 7 months
 +
File:353_8month.png|After 8 months
 +
File:353_9months.png|After 9 months
 +
File:353_10months.png|After 10 months
 +
File:353_11months.png|After 11 months
 +
File:353_12months.png|After 12 months
 +
</gallery>
  
−
See Planck/PSO/2006-009 section 4.2.2 for more details on these quantities.
+
== Main planet and Crab observations during Surveys 1-7 ==
  
 +
Solar System objects and the Crab Nebula have been observed many times during the Planck surveys. Here is a complete list of these observations. Note that the ''deep rings'' and ''drift scans'' (Mars only) are in '''boldface'''.
  
 +
* Crab: Sept. 16-22, 2009
  
−
Meaning of these requirements:
+
* Mars: Oct. 17-29, 2009
−
- mean: the integration time averaged over the sky at the end of the mission should be at least the one mentioned in the table, for each row / frequency
 
−
- the precentile of sky not observed should be zero
 
−
- (no strong requirement from the three central columns)
 
−
- the precentile of sky suffering from sharp gradients should be at most the value indicated in the table, for each row / frequency (TBC)
 
−
- the percentile of the sky for which scanning directions probed are at least 5 over 16 should be at least the value indicated in the table
 
  
 +
* Jupiter: Oct. 25 – Nov. 1, 2009
  
 +
* Neptune: Nov. 1-8, 2009
  
−
Survey goals are numbers which are wished to be achieved at the end of the Planck nominal mission.  
+
* Uranus: Dec. 6-16, 2009
−
Survey goals correspond to the values obtained after a complete nominal mission (15 months of survey with nominal noise – as predicted from ground, and no gaps).
 
−
The survey goals are the same quantities as the survey requirements.
 
−
The tables below present these quantities the same way as for the survey requirements.
 
  
 +
* Saturn: Jan. 2-8, 2010
  
−
=== Start and end of surveys ===
+
* Crab: March 6-12, 2010
  
−
The completion of a given “survey” is declared when the logical AND of all frequency-coverage maps is greater than 95 %, OR the sky has been surveyed over a consecutive period of 7.5 months.
+
* Mars: April 9-18, 2010
  
−
In practice, since the gaps during the surveys have always been very small, it results in ~ six months per survey.
+
* Neptune: May 15-23, 2010
 +
 
 +
* Saturn: June 13-22, 2010
 +
 
 +
* Uranus: June 27 – July 5, 2010
 +
 
 +
* Jupiter: July 1-9, 2010
  
−
* Survey 1: starts August 13, 2009, ends Feb. 10, 2010
+
* Crab: Sept. 15-21, 2010
  
−
* Survey 2: starts Feb. 10, 2010, ends Aug. 14, 2010
+
* Neptune: Nov. 3-11, 2010
  
−
* Survey 3: starts Aug. 14, 2010, ends Feb. 12, 2011
+
* Jupiter: Dec. 9-18, 2010
  
−
* Survey 4: starts Feb. 12, 2011, ends July 30th, 2011
+
* Uranus: Dec. 12-21, 2010
  
−
This survey was shortened in ordered to start earlier with the new scanning strategy (see above)
+
* Saturn: Jan. 15-22, 2011
  
−
* Survey 5:  
+
* Crab: March 7-12, 2011
  
 +
* Neptune: May 18-26, 2011
  
−
=== Planets and calibrators during surveys ===
+
* Saturn: June 30 - July 9, 2011
  
−
* Crab: Sept. 16, 2009 – Sept. 22, 2009
+
* Uranus: July 3-11, 2011
  
−
* Mars: Oct. 17, 2009 – Oct. 29, 2009
+
* Jupiter: Aug. 9-15, 2011
  
−
* Jupiter: Oct. 25, 2009 – Nov. 1, 2009
+
* Crab: Sept. 10-18, 2011
  
−
* Neptune: Nov. 1, 2009 – Nov. 8, 2009
+
This Crab scan was performed with the 250 deg. phase cycloidal strategy.
  
−
* Uranus: Dec. 6, 2009 – Dec. 16, 2009
+
* Crab: Sept. 20-23, 2011
  
−
* Saturn: Jan. 2, 2010 – Jan. 8, 2010
+
This Crab scan was performed with the 340 deg. phase cycloidal strategy.
  
−
* Crab: March 6, 2010 – March 12, 2010
+
* '''Mars''': Dec. 8-16, 2011 ("drift scan": Mars is let move through the Planck focal plane via its proper motion)
  
−
* Mars: April 9, 2010 – April 18, 2010
+
* Mars: Dec. 17-26, 2011 (normal scanning)
  
−
* Neptune: May 15, 2010 – May 23, 2010
+
* '''Jupiter''': Jan. 8-30, 2012 (deep ring)
  
−
* Saturn: June 13, 2010 – June 22, 2010
+
* '''Crab''': Feb. 26 - March 16, 2012 (deep ring)
  
−
* Uranus: June 27, 2010 – July 5, 2010
+
* '''Jupiter''': Sept. 1-14, 2012 (deep ring)
  
−
* Jupiter: July 1, 2010 – July 9, 2010
+
* '''Crab''': Sept. 14 - Oct. 1, 2012 (deep ring)
  
−
* Crab: Sept. 15, 2010 – Sept. 21, 2010
+
* Neptune: Nov. 19-27, 2012
  
−
* Neptune: Nov. 3, 2010 – Nov. 11, 2010
+
* Uranus: Dec. 24-30, 2012
  
−
* Jupiter: Dec. 9, 2010 – Dec. 18, 2010
+
* Saturn: Jan. 30 - Feb. 5, 2013
  
−
* Uranus: Dec. 12, 2010 – Dec. 21, 2010
+
* '''Jupiter''': Feb. 2013 (deep ring)
  
−
* Saturn: Jan. 15, 2011 – Jan. 22, 2011
+
== Resulting integration time distribution ==
  
−
* Crab: March 7, 2011 – March 12, 2011
+
The integration time after the end of HFI operations (January 2012) is shown in the following picture gallery.
  
−
* Neptune: May 18, 2011 – May 26, 2011
+
Units are seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector, for all maps. The projection is full-sky Mollweide centered on the Galactic Centre.
  
−
* Saturn: June 30, 2011 – July 9, 2011
 
  
−
* Uranus: July 3, 2011 – July 11, 2011
 
  
−
* Jupiter: Aug. 9, 2011 – Aug. 15, 2011
+
<gallery widths=330px perrow=3 caption="Integration time after the end of HFI operations (January 2012). Units are seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector.">
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_100GHz1-4.png|HFI 100 GHz 1,4
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_100GHz2-3.png|HFI 100 GHz 2,3
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_143GHz1-4.png|HFI 143 GHz 1-4
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_143GHz5-8.png|HFI 143 GHz 5-8
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_217GHz1-4.png|HFI 217 GHz 1-4
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_217GHz5-8.png|HFI 217 GHz 5-8
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_353GHz.png|HFI 353 GHz
 +
File:HFI_fullmission_545-857GHz.png|HFI 545 GHz / 857 GHz
 +
File:LFI25_coldmission.png|LFI-25 (44 GHz)
 +
File:LFI27_coldmission.png|LFI 30 GHz
 +
</gallery>
  
  
 +
==References==
 +
<References />
 +
  
  
−
[[Category:Ground Segment and Operations]]
+
[[Category:Introduction|004]]
 +
[[Category:PSOBook]]

Latest revision as of 14:28, 22 July 2014

The observation strategy[edit]

The Planck observation strategy, or scanning strategy, makes use of the characteristics of the Planck spacecraft Planck-Early-I[1] and orbit in order to achieve the survey goals in terms of sky coverage and scanning directions.

The Planck focal plane scans the sky in the way explained in the figure below.

The Planck focal plane with the direction of scanning. Polarization-sensitive detectors are drawn with crosses indicating the polarization direction.

The 353 GHz row scans the sky in small circles with a 85 deg. bore-sight angle from the spin axis. 545 GHz, 857 GHz, 143 GHz bolometers as well as LFI 25-26 radiometers have a slightly smaller bore-sight angle, while the other part of the Planck focal plane have larger ones (up to ~ 89 deg.). The Planck spacecraft spins at a rate of 1 rpm.

Planck, being at L2, moves along the Ecliptic at ~ one degree per day, and needs to keep the Solar aspect angle below ~ 9 degrees at all times. In practice, during the surveys, the limit considered is 8 deg. Another celestial constraint is that the angle between the Planck spin axis and the anti-Earth direction cannot exceed 15 deg. (relaxed to 17 deg. from Survey 5 onward). These constraints have a very direct influence on the chosen scanning strategy.

Simplified way to show the Planck scanning strategy, without additional motion of the spin axis
The Planck scanning strategy with the additional motion of the spin axis.

The path followed by the Planck spin axis is defined with respect to the Ecliptic plane. It corresponds to a motion in longitude which maintains an anti-Sun pointing (about one degree per day), to which is added a cycloidal motion (precession) of the spin axis around the anti-Sun position (fiducial point). The cycloidal path is defined by the following functions:

$ λ = θ sin((-1)^n ω (t-t_0)+φ) $ (eq. 1)

$β = -θ cos((-1)^n ω(t-t_0) + φ) $ (eq. 2)

where λ is the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic longitude, β the angular distance from the fiducial point in Ecliptic latitude, θ the spin axis precession amplitude, ω the pulsation of the precession, φ its phase, n the parameter which controls the motion direction of the precession, t is the time, and $t_0$ is the first time during the Planck survey at which the fiducial point crosses the 0 Ecliptic longitude line.

Spin axis path with a 7 degree amplitude cycloidal scanning, from [2]

The reasons to decide to use such a precession of the spin axis are the following :

  • An excursion of the spin axis from the anti-Sun direction is required to fully observe the whole sky (no excursion would leave a large area unobserved around the Ecliptic poles)
  • The precession motion allows to keep the Sun aspect angle constant during the whole survey, therefore minimizing the thermal constraint variations on the spacecraft

The following precession parameters have been chosen for the BSS:

  • amplitude $θ = 7.5^o$ (this value is the lowest possible which allows to cover the whole sky with all detectors)
  • n = 1 (anti-clockwise motion as seen from the Sun)
  • pulsation ω = 2π / (half a year). Faster precession was considered, and has interesting advantages, but is not possible given the constraints if one wants to keep a 7.5 deg. amplitude (which is necessary to cover the whole sky).
  • The phase of the precession was decided according to this set of criteria (in order of importance):

a) respecting the operational constraints,

b) allowing the largest possible angle between two scans on the Crab,

c) avoiding null dipole amplitude for the whole mission,

d) optimizing the position of the planets in the beginning of the survey and with respect to the feasibility of their recovery,

e) placing the two “deep fields” where Galactic foregrounds are minimum,

f) allowing a reasonable survey margin (i.e. the time allowed to recover lost pointings if a problem occurs)

The phase is 340 deg. for Surveys 1 to 4, and 250 deg. for Surveys 5 to 8.

The scanning strategy for the second year of Routine Operations (i.e. Surveys 3 and 4) is exactly the same as for the first year, except that all pointings are shifted by 1 arcmin along the cross-scanning direction, in order to provide finer sky sampling for the highest frequency detectors when combining two years of observations.

The change of phase between Survey 4 and Survey 5 occurred because it was found essential especially on the HFI side that scanning direction crossings are increased in the Planck survey. By choosing a phase 90 deg. away from the original one, one optimizes the scanning strategy in this respect.

The details of the justifications for these parameters can be found in PL-WG9-TN-001.

The scanning strategy parameters are input to the PSO Survey Planning and Performance Tool, which is the software which generates the series of pointing records to be sent out to MOC for implementation.

An approximate visualisation of the Planck scanning strategy can be found here and here.

Spin axis manoeuvres and exact pointings[edit]

The motion of the spin axis is not continuous. Every change in the spin axis position is initiated by a manoeuvre which requires less than 5 minutes time to complete.

The duration between spin-axis manoeuvres is hereafter referred to as “dwelling times"; and the angular distance between manoeuvres along the spin axis path is hereafter referred to as “spacing”.

The dwelling times and spacings are defined as follows:

  • The spacings are fixed to 2’ which roughly corresponds to Nyquist criterion for sampling the highest-frequency HFI detectors.
  • The dwell times vary from 2360 s to 3904 s.

The exact series of coordinates and dwell times are set by equations 1 and 2 when one has fixed the spacings.

Data gap recoveries[edit]

Gaps in the data flow can occur because of various reasons:

  • Anomalies may occur at spacecraft or instrument level, but also due to failures in the ground-to-spacecraft link or the ground segment itself. The adverse effects of such anomalies may be the loss of scientific data corresponding to one or several planned pointings, which have either not been acquired and/or stored in memory.
  • Failure to acquire proper scientific data may occur to one or both instruments

In case a gap occurs, scientific criteria are applied to decide whether to recover the data through the Small-Gap Recovery procedure.

The 353 GHz detectors Planck-PreLaunch-III[3] integration time after 389 Operational Days (the unit is seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector). The first significant data gap and recovery are clearly visible.

The Small-Gap Recovery (SGR) procedure can be applied by MOC or PSO:

  • MOC-triggered SGR: Within its nominal scheduling procedure for an OD, the MOC searches the PPL for PREF corresponding to the OD being processed and any pointings which are subject of a Small Gap Recovery. As the PREF are sorted in chronological order according to their nominal start time, those corresponding to a small gap will naturally be the earliest. After checking attitude constraints, all observable pointings are listed and their dwell times reduced (initially) to the Minimum Dwell Time (MDT) as given in the PPL.

Having included all valid PREF the required slew times are calculated. With the required slew times and minimum dwell times for all pointings, the OD schedule may be under-populated; in this case the dwell times of all scheduled pointings will be increased equally to make use of all available time in the OD. If the resulting schedule is over-populated, even with MDT for all pointings, the recovery cannot be constrained to a single OD. The sequence of pointings for the ODs involved will be optimized in PREF scheduling and dwell times in order to effect the recovery and revert to the nominal timeline as quickly as possible.

  • PSO-triggered SGR:

PSO declares a small gap when pointings that have been executed result in data of insufficient quality or inadequate frequency coverage. This assessment is based on data quality and instrument health information provided by the DPCs. The algorithm that is used by the PSO to check the scientific validity of a pointing is implemented within the SPPT software tool. The SPPT ingests on a weekly basis a Weekly Health Report (WHR) for the HFI and LFI containing information on the current working status of each detector and their expected condition over the next four weeks. On a daily basis, a Daily Quality Report (DQR) provided by the DPCs for both instruments, includes a set of parameters that describe the quality of the detection achieved by each individual detector for every pointing executed.

The scheme for declaring a Small-Gap Recovery from PSO is the following:

- If a pointing fails to meet the chosen requirement, it becomes an SGR candidate

- If there are at least 12 consecutive pointings which are declared SGR candidates, and the problem has been identified and solved, then an SGR is triggered Recoveries are only carried out if the recovery slewing out is guaranteed to be in OCM. MOC carries out this analysis and decides whether they perform the SGR accordingly.

- The start and end times of the gap and the list of the pointing numbers (or just the numbers of the first and last pointings to be recovered) are then sent to MOC by E-mail, with the notification to start a Small-Gap Recovery

- MOC implements the Small-Gap Recovery, provided the pointings can still be scheduled with respect to their latest start time, using the same scheme as described in the MOC-triggered SGR section

Throughout the Planck mission, data losses have been very rare. Small-Gap Recovery has been applied only a couple of times.

Special observations[edit]

The special observations are:

  • normal scanning on Solar System objects for calibration purposes
The Crab Nebula (Messier 1, NGC 1952, Taurus A), here seen by the Hubble Space Telescope
Mars as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1999

This concerns the following objects (planets): Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune whose thermal emission in the far-infrared and their point-source-like quality make them essential calibrators for spider-web bolometers and radiometers.

Mars is a particularly interesting calibrator for Planck because of its proper motion. However this proper motion makes it difficult to observe it many times during the mission.

Jupiter is the brightest source for (non-polarized) calibration. Saturn is also used a lot, and Uranus and Neptune are secondary calibrators.

  • normal scanning on other (non-moving) sources for calibration purposes

This concerns mostly the Crab Nebula for polarizer calibration purposes. This supernova remnant is highly polarized and as such represents the main polarization calibrator for Planck.

  • special pointings during the calibration phase, not relative to celestial sources
  • "deep rings" : these special observations are performed on each passage of Jupiter and the Crab Nebula, from January 2012 onward.

They consist of very deeply sampled observations (0.5') with the spin axis along the Ecliptic plane, during typically two to three weeks.

These observations benefit from special relaxing of the celestial constraints with Solar Aspect Angles < 9 deg. rather than < 8 deg. during cycloidal surveying.

  • "drift scans" : these special observations are performed on Mars, making use of its proper motion

Start and end of surveys[edit]

The completion of a given “survey” is declared when the logical AND of all frequency-coverage maps is greater than 95 %, OR the sky has been surveyed over a consecutive period of 7.5 months. Note that this definition is that of the Project Scientist and Planck Science Office. Data Processing Centres do not use the same concept of surveys to create "survey" maps.

In practice, since the gaps during the surveys have always been very small, it results in ~ six months per survey.

The Planck mission timeline with the distribution of the "sky surveys".
  • Survey 1: starts August 13, 2009, ends Feb. 13, 2010
  • Survey 2: starts Feb. 14, 2010, ends Aug. 13, 2010
  • Survey 3: starts Aug. 14, 2010, ends Feb. 13, 2011
  • Survey 4: starts Feb. 14, 2011, ends July 29th, 2011

This survey was shortened in ordered to start earlier with the new scanning strategy (see above).

  • Survey 5: starts July 29th, 2011, ends January 30th, 2012
  • Survey 6 (LFI only): starts January 30th, 2012, ends July 31st, 2012
  • Survey 7 (LFI only): starts July 31st, 2012, ends January 31st, 2013
  • Survey 8 (LFI only): starts February 1st, 2013, ends August 1st, 2013


Completion of full sky coverage during Surveys 1-2[edit]

The picture gallery below exhibits the progress of sky coverage during the first months of survey (black color = unobserved areas).


  • The HFI 353 GHz integration time after N months of survey. Unit is seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector.

  • After 1 month

  • After 2 months

  • After 3 months

  • After 4 months

  • After 5 months

  • After 6 months

  • After 7 months

  • After 8 months

  • After 9 months

  • After 10 months

  • After 11 months

  • After 12 months

Main planet and Crab observations during Surveys 1-7[edit]

Solar System objects and the Crab Nebula have been observed many times during the Planck surveys. Here is a complete list of these observations. Note that the deep rings and drift scans (Mars only) are in boldface.

  • Crab: Sept. 16-22, 2009
  • Mars: Oct. 17-29, 2009
  • Jupiter: Oct. 25 – Nov. 1, 2009
  • Neptune: Nov. 1-8, 2009
  • Uranus: Dec. 6-16, 2009
  • Saturn: Jan. 2-8, 2010
  • Crab: March 6-12, 2010
  • Mars: April 9-18, 2010
  • Neptune: May 15-23, 2010
  • Saturn: June 13-22, 2010
  • Uranus: June 27 – July 5, 2010
  • Jupiter: July 1-9, 2010
  • Crab: Sept. 15-21, 2010
  • Neptune: Nov. 3-11, 2010
  • Jupiter: Dec. 9-18, 2010
  • Uranus: Dec. 12-21, 2010
  • Saturn: Jan. 15-22, 2011
  • Crab: March 7-12, 2011
  • Neptune: May 18-26, 2011
  • Saturn: June 30 - July 9, 2011
  • Uranus: July 3-11, 2011
  • Jupiter: Aug. 9-15, 2011
  • Crab: Sept. 10-18, 2011

This Crab scan was performed with the 250 deg. phase cycloidal strategy.

  • Crab: Sept. 20-23, 2011

This Crab scan was performed with the 340 deg. phase cycloidal strategy.

  • Mars: Dec. 8-16, 2011 ("drift scan": Mars is let move through the Planck focal plane via its proper motion)
  • Mars: Dec. 17-26, 2011 (normal scanning)
  • Jupiter: Jan. 8-30, 2012 (deep ring)
  • Crab: Feb. 26 - March 16, 2012 (deep ring)
  • Jupiter: Sept. 1-14, 2012 (deep ring)
  • Crab: Sept. 14 - Oct. 1, 2012 (deep ring)
  • Neptune: Nov. 19-27, 2012
  • Uranus: Dec. 24-30, 2012
  • Saturn: Jan. 30 - Feb. 5, 2013
  • Jupiter: Feb. 2013 (deep ring)

Resulting integration time distribution[edit]

The integration time after the end of HFI operations (January 2012) is shown in the following picture gallery.

Units are seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector, for all maps. The projection is full-sky Mollweide centered on the Galactic Centre.


  • Integration time after the end of HFI operations (January 2012). Units are seconds per square degree, normalized to one detector.

  • HFI 100 GHz 1,4

  • HFI 100 GHz 2,3

  • HFI 143 GHz 1-4

  • HFI 143 GHz 5-8

  • HFI 217 GHz 1-4

  • HFI 217 GHz 5-8

  • HFI 353 GHz

  • HFI 545 GHz / 857 GHz

  • LFI-25 (44 GHz)

  • LFI 30 GHz


References[edit]

  1. ↑ Planck early results. I. The Planck mission, Planck Collaboration I, A&A, 536, A1, (2011).
  2. ↑ Scanning strategy for mapping the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies with Planck, X. Dupac, J. Tauber, A&A, 430, 363-371, (2005).
  3. ↑ Planck pre-launch status: The HFI instrument, from specification to actual performance, J.-M. Lamarre, J.-L. Puget, P. A. R. Ade, F. Bouchet, G. Guyot, A. E. Lange, F. Pajot, A. Arondel, K. Benabed, J.-L. Beney, A. Benoît, J.-P. Bernard, R. Bhatia, Y. Blanc, J. J. Bock, E. Bréelle, T. W. Bradshaw, P. Camus, A. Catalano, J. Charra, M. Charra, S. E. Church, F. Couchot, A. Coulais, B. P. Crill, M. R. Crook, K. Dassas, P. de Bernardis, J. Delabrouille, P. de Marcillac, J.-M. Delouis, F.-X. Désert, C. Dumesnil, X. Dupac, G. Efstathiou, P. Eng, C. Evesque, J.-J. Fourmond, K. Ganga, M. Giard, R. Gispert, L. Guglielmi, J. Haissinski, S. Henrot-Versillé, E. Hivon, W. A. Holmes, W. C. Jones, T. C. Koch, H. Lagardère, P. Lami, J. Landé, B. Leriche, C. Leroy, Y. Longval, J. F. Macías-Pérez, T. Maciaszek, B. Maffei, B. Mansoux, C. Marty, S. Masi, C. Mercier, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, A. Moneti, L. Montier, J. A. Murphy, J. Narbonne, M. Nexon, C. G. Paine, J. Pahn, O. Perdereau, F. Piacentini, M. Piat, S. Plaszczynski, E. Pointecouteau, R. Pons, N. Ponthieu, S. Prunet, D. Rambaud, G. Recouvreur, C. Renault, I. Ristorcelli, C. Rosset, D. Santos, G. Savini, G. Serra, P. Stassi, R. V. Sudiwala, J.-F. Sygnet, J. A. Tauber, J.-P. Torre, M. Tristram, L. Vibert, A. Woodcraft, V. Yurchenko, D. Yvon, A&A, 520, A9+, (2010).

(Planck) Low Frequency Instrument

revolutions per minute

(Planck) High Frequency Instrument

Planck Science Office

[ESA's] Mission Operation Center [Darmstadt, Germany]

Small Gap Recovery

Operation Day definition is geometric visibility driven as it runs from the start of a DTCP (satellite Acquisition Of Signal) to the start of the next DTCP. Given the different ground stations and spacecraft will takes which station for how long, the OD duration varies but it is basically once a day.

Pre-programmed Pointing List

Survey Performance and Planning Tool

Weekly Health Report

Daily Quality Report

[LFI meaning]: absolute calibration refers to the 0th order calibration for each channel, 1 single number, while the relative calibration refers to the component of the calibration that varies pointing period by pointing period.

Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.cosmos.esa.int/planckpla/index.php?title=Survey_scanning_and_performance&oldid=7885’