Difference between revisions of "Summary LFI"

From Planck PLA 2015 Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}}
 
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Summary of LFI data characteristics}}
The LFI performance are summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper <cite>#planck2013-p02</cite> {{P2013|2}}.
+
Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a03}}.
 +
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02}} -->
 +
 
 +
 
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" align="center"
 +
|+ '''Table 1. LFI performance parameters'''
 +
|-
 +
!scope="col"| Parameter
 +
!scope="col"| 30 GHz
 +
!scope="col"| 44 GHz
 +
!scope="col"| 70 GHz
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Centre frequency [GHz]
 +
|width="100" | 28.4
 +
|width="100" | 44.1
 +
|width="100" | 70.4
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Scanning beam FWHM<sup>a</sup> [arcmin]
 +
|width="100" | 33.10
 +
|width="100" | 27.94
 +
|width="100" | 13.08
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Scanning beam ellipticity<sup>a</sup>
 +
|width="100" | 1.37
 +
|width="100" | 1.25
 +
|width="100" | 1.27
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Effective beam FWHM<sup>b</sup> [arcmin]
 +
|width="100" | 32.29
 +
|width="100" | 27.00
 +
|width="100" | 13.21
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | White noise level in map<sup>c</sup> [&mu;K<sub>CMB</sub>]
 +
|width="100" | *TBD
 +
|width="100" | *TBD
 +
|width="100" | *TBD
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | White noise level in timelines<sup>d</sup> [&mu;K<sub>CMB</sub> s<sup>1/2</sup>]
 +
|width="100" | 148.1
 +
|width="100" | 174.2
 +
|width="100" | 152.0
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | <i>f</i><sub>knee</sub><sup>d</sup> [mHz]
 +
|width="100" | 114.1
 +
|width="100" | 52.4
 +
|width="100" | 19.7
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | 1/<i>f</i> slope<sup>d</sup>
 +
|width="100" | -0.92
 +
|width="100" | -0.88
 +
|width="100" | -1.20
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Overall calibration uncertainty<sup>e</sup> [%]
 +
|width="100" | 0.35
 +
|width="100" | 0.26
 +
|width="100" | 0.29
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>I</i> <sup>f</sup> [&mu;K<sub>CMB</sub>]
 +
|width="100" | 0.88
 +
|width="100" | 1.97
 +
|width="100" | 1.87
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>Q</i> <sup>f</sup> [&mu;K<sub>CMB</sub>]
 +
|width="100" | 1.11
 +
|width="100" | 1.14
 +
|width="100" | 2.25
 +
|-
 +
|width="320" | Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes <i>U</i> <sup>f</sup> [&mu;K<sub>CMB</sub>]
 +
|width="100" | 0.95
 +
|width="100" | 1.29
 +
|width="100" | 2.22
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
<sup>a</sup> Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines.
 +
 
 +
<sup>b</sup> Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, &Omega;<sub>eff</sub> = mean(&Omega;). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline ({{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a35||Planck-2015-A35}}).
 +
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p05}} -->
 +
 
 +
<sup>c</sup> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps.
 +
 
 +
<sup>d</sup> Values derived from fitting noise spectra.
 +
 
 +
<sup>e</sup> Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at 50 < &#8467; < 250, see {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a05}}.
 +
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02b}} -->
 +
 
 +
<sup>f</sup> Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value distributions from simulated maps, see {{PlanckPapers|planck2014-a03}}.
 +
<!-- {{PlanckPapers|planck2013-p02a}} -->
  
  
<center>
 
'''Table 1. Summary of the LFI performance parameters'''
 
[[File:tab_perf2.jpg|thumb|center|600px|
 
<math>^{ \rm a \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from scanning beam evaluated fitting Jupiter directly in the timelines. <math>\hspace{480mm} </math>
 
<math>^{ \rm b \, }</math> FWHM from effective beam estimated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam. Those are the values used in the source extraction pipeline <cite>#planck2013-p05</cite> {{P2013|28}}.
 
<math>{\hspace{1pt}}</math>
 
<math>^{ \rm c \, }</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. Those values are within the 1% with the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking in account the actual mission time minus the manoeuvres and bad-science flagged data.
 
]]
 
</center>
 
  
 
<!--
 
<!--
Line 17: Line 95:
 
'''Table 1. Summary of the LFI performance parameters'''
 
'''Table 1. Summary of the LFI performance parameters'''
 
[[File:Lfi_perf.jpg|thumb|center|655px|<math>^{ \rm a \, }</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. Those values are within the 1% with the withe noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking in account the actual mission time minus the manoeuvres and bad-science flagged data
 
[[File:Lfi_perf.jpg|thumb|center|655px|<math>^{ \rm a \, }</math> White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. Those values are within the 1% with the withe noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking in account the actual mission time minus the manoeuvres and bad-science flagged data
<math>^{ \rm b \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from scanning beam evaluated fitting Jupiter directly in the timelines. <math>\hspace{50mm} </math>
+
<math>^{ \rm b \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from scanning beam evaluated fitting Jupiter directly in the timelines. <math>\hspace{49mm} </math>
 
<math>^{ \rm c \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from effective beam evaluated as mean from different position on the sky. <math>\hspace{42mm} </math>
 
<math>^{ \rm c \, }</math> FWHM and ellipticity from effective beam evaluated as mean from different position on the sky. <math>\hspace{42mm} </math>
 
<math>^{ \rm d \, }</math> FWHM from effective beam evaluated as FWHM<math>_{eff} = \sqrt{\frac{Ω}{2π}} · 2 · \sqrt{2 \log 2}</math>, where Ω is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam. Those are the values used in the source extraction pipeline <cite>#planck2013-p05</cite> {{P2013|28}}
 
<math>^{ \rm d \, }</math> FWHM from effective beam evaluated as FWHM<math>_{eff} = \sqrt{\frac{Ω}{2π}} · 2 · \sqrt{2 \log 2}</math>, where Ω is the mean beam solid angle of the effective beam. Those are the values used in the source extraction pipeline <cite>#planck2013-p05</cite> {{P2013|28}}
Line 25: Line 103:
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
+
<references />
<biblio force=false>
 
#[[References]]
 
</biblio>
 
  
 
[[Category:LFI data processing|008]]
 
[[Category:LFI data processing|008]]

Latest revision as of 10:09, 26 September 2016

Quantification of the performance of LFI is summarized in Table 1 below. All the details can be found in the LFI data processing paper Planck-2015-A02[1].


Table 1. LFI performance parameters
Parameter 30 GHz 44 GHz 70 GHz
Centre frequency [GHz] 28.4 44.1 70.4
Scanning beam FWHMa [arcmin] 33.10 27.94 13.08
Scanning beam ellipticitya 1.37 1.25 1.27
Effective beam FWHMb [arcmin] 32.29 27.00 13.21
White noise level in mapc [μKCMB] *TBD *TBD *TBD
White noise level in timelinesd [μKCMB s1/2] 148.1 174.2 152.0
fkneed [mHz] 114.1 52.4 19.7
1/f sloped -0.92 -0.88 -1.20
Overall calibration uncertaintye [%] 0.35 0.26 0.29
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes I f [μKCMB] 0.88 1.97 1.87
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes Q f [μKCMB] 1.11 1.14 2.25
Systematic effects uncertainty in Stokes U f [μKCMB] 0.95 1.29 2.22

a Determined by fitting Jupiter observations directly in the timelines.

b Calculated from the main beam solid angle of the effective beam, Ωeff = mean(Ω). These values are used in the source extraction pipeline (Planck-2015-A35[2]).

c White noise per pixel computed from half-ring difference maps. These values are within 1% of the white noise sensitivity computed directly on the timelines, taking into account the actual integration time represented in the maps.

d Values derived from fitting noise spectra.

e Sum of the error on the estimation of the calibration constant (0.25 %) and the square root of the squared sum of the following errors: beam uncertainty; sidelobe convolution effect; and unknown systematics as measured from the power spectrum at 50 < ℓ < 250, see Planck-2015-A04[3].

f Peak-to-peak difference between 99% and 1% quantities in the pixel value distributions from simulated maps, see Planck-2015-A02[1].



References[edit]

  1. 1.01.1 Planck 2015 results. II. LFI processing, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A2.
  2. Planck 2015 results. XXVI. The second Planck catalogue of compact sources, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A26.
  3. Planck 2015 results. IV. LFI beams and window functions, Planck Collaboration, 2016, A&A, 594, A4.

(Planck) Low Frequency Instrument

Full-Width-at-Half-Maximum

Cosmic Microwave background

To be defined / determined